Executive 'forced out of job' over LinkedIn CV

Nom Chompsky

High Tory
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
54,616
Reaction score
39,465
Location
Cape Town
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...utive-forced-out-of-job-over-LinkedIn-CV.html

Wow this is absolute madness. Which normal person would not be interested in career opportunities?

I know in the article it says it's company policy to 'untick' the career opportunities box, but it seems not even the head of the disciplinary panel followed it. :D

John Flexman, 34, is thought to be the first person in the country to bring a case for constructive dismissal after a dispute with bosses over his profile on the professional networking site LinkedIn.

Mr Flexman is claiming hundreds of thousands of pounds from BG Group, a major gas exploration firm based in Reading, Berks, where he earned a ÂŁ68,000 salary in charge of graduate recruitment.

As well as loading his CV onto the site, Mr Flexman ticked a box to register an interest in “career opportunities”.

But he was contacted by his manager while on holiday in the United States and ordered to remove his CV. On his return he was accused of “inappropriate use of social media” and called to attend an internal disciplinary hearing.

He was handed a list of disciplinary charges and told he could be sacked, Reading Employment Tribunal heard.

BG Group said he was in breach of new company policy on conflicts of interest which it said banned employees ticking the “career opportunities” box.

He was also accused of including confidential information in his CV such as details about how he had reduced firm's the rate of staff attrition.

However, Mr Flexman claims the details he posted were available in the company’s annual reports and that 21 of his colleagues, including the manager of the disciplinary process, had ticked the "career opportunities" box but had not been disciplined.
 
How can they exert any control over what you do in social media? You OWN the social media profile, not them. They dont own my LinkedIn profile or my facebook profile, or my private GMail account. What next, my private GMail account must use a company signature?

How is a rule like that even legal?
 
Typical company attitude. They'd dump this guy in a heartbeat if they decided they didn't need him any longer, but he can't indicate he'd consider other opportunities. He can and should be looking out for his own interests first and foremost.

It's pretty much normal for profiles on LinkedIn to have this option ticked anyway.
 
I have read articles where companies actually want your username and password for any social sites you might belong to. And I've seen a pic of the application form where you have to tick off the various sites.
 
Don't discount the possibility that they wanted to get rid of him anyway and this was just the excuse.
 
How can they exert any control over what you do in social media? You OWN the social media profile, not them. They dont own my LinkedIn profile or my facebook profile, or my private GMail account. What next, my private GMail account must use a company signature?

How is a rule like that even legal?

Its called a contract which was voluntarily agreed to.
 
Its called a contract which was voluntarily agreed to.

Even if agreed to not all contracts are legal & binding. Where a contract violates laws (ie common law, employment law, constitution etc) then the employer can find themselves on the receiving end of the stick. Not saying this is the case here as I have not read the article.
 
I have read articles where companies actually want your username and password for any social sites you might belong to. And I've seen a pic of the application form where you have to tick off the various sites.

Geez I would tell them to get lost. No job is worth that much. And I would never sign a contract giving them any say over any of my social network profiles.
 
There may well be more to this story.

Its called a contract which was voluntarily agreed to.
This is why we have labour and other laws to mitigate corporate power. Definitely overstepping their bounds if the career opportunities indication is their complaint against Flexman. Companies also commonly overstep in regard to what they demand be kept secret.
 
Lol! If a company I wanted to work for demanded my social usernames and passwords I would first ask for all the directors ones, you know so I can ensure I am joining a reputable organisation run by salt of the earth people ;)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X