Google won’t favour Motorola over rivals after acquisition

Well The US Justice department will also give their verdict next week, I guess they just waiting for Europe to go 1st.

Google-Motorola deal set to be approved by U.S. Justice Department, says WSJ

Google's aquisition of Motorola Mobility is set to be approved by the U.S. Justice Department as early as next week, according to the Wall Street Journal and people "familiar with the matter." These sort of deals are never a given, as the various governments across the world always have the final say on matters of commerce. This deal would arm Google with very desirable hardware patents for mobile devices, which really is the reason for the entire investigation.

The Justice Department, as well as European Union legislators, are very concerned that Google allows other companies to use these patents under FRAND (fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory) rules, which prohibit things like overcharging for licenses or blocking access to the patents outright. They should be -- look at all the legal mess smartphone manufacturers are in now, then muddy that picture further by changing license requirements for the things that make a cell phone work. We're not talking lock screens or rounded corners here, Motorola owns IP that all cell phones need and use to operate. Taking away licenses for core technology would benefit nobody, and Google has pledged not to do it.

Instead, Google has sent letters to to numerous standards organizations, stating that it would offer FRAND licensing for patents in Motorola's portfolio. They didn't promise not to seek damages or injunctions from potential violators, though. Google stated that it "reserves its right to seek any and all appropriate judicial remedies against counterparties that refuse to license its FRAND patents." Mutual destruction tactics at their finest.

We tend to take things like this from the Wall Street Journal at face value, and this is no exception. Their track record stands on it's own. If this is true, and the EU (whose own deadline for a decision is Feb. 13) gives a green light we should know more next week. We'll keep you posted.

Source Android Central

I think Google's idea of wont favour, is a case of dont sue us and we wont sue you.
 
they were kind of backed into a corner and the move looked like it wasn't well thought through to me.
they will need to show very clear intentions and some non-token sign to their vendors to regain loyalty and allay fears.
in a world where controlling the entire ecosystem seems to be the best way forward, the signs can be easily interpreted as hostile to oem's.
if i were an oem, i'd be hedging my bets by getting pally with redmond.
interesting times.
 
I wonder if this is the reason that Samsung is moving away from Android?
 
they were kind of backed into a corner and the move looked like it wasn't well thought through to me.
they will need to show very clear intentions and some non-token sign to their vendors to regain loyalty and allay fears.
in a world where controlling the entire ecosystem seems to be the best way forward, the signs can be easily interpreted as hostile to oem's.
if i were an oem, i'd be hedging my bets by getting pally with redmond.
interesting times.


Thats the thing, Dont forget Samsung, LG HTC and all the other already have Windows Phone 7 models also where do you go as even Microsoft has decided to give Nokia prime access so unless you have your own OS you kind of in a corner.

Worse case is you have to look at WebOS, or Tizen or start something in house and we know ho good that worked for Bada and Meego.

So it basically boils down to this deal and that Google do not favor Motorola to others. I think the best thing Google can do after the deal has been approved is to Announce that HTC/LG or anyone other than Motorola will release the next Nexus.

I wonder if this is the reason that Samsung is moving away from Android?

Huh? where did you suck that rumor from?
 
Well I get more like they gave up/change tacktics of a division than moving away. Moving away means releasing less Android models and that does not seem to be the case.

So what do you think the Galaxy S3 will be running?
 
So what do you think the Galaxy S3 will be running?

Android, if it doesn't its not a Galaxy and a Wave instead. Samsung Galaxy name is reserved for Android devices.

Omnia Models = Windows
Galaxy Models = Android
Wave Models = Bada/Tizen
 
If Samsung had to drop Android they would instantly be giving up the number 2 spot on smartphone sales.

What kind of idiot ceo would even do that?
 
Was on google hangeouts and people were comparing phones. The one had an iPhone the others had Motorolo Droids. They asked me if I have a Android phone. I said yes an HTC but they never heard of it. I imagine then the carriers in the US and UK rebrand the HTCs like Orange do.
 
Was on google hangeouts and people were comparing phones. The one had an iPhone the others had Motorolo Droids. They asked me if I have a Android phone. I said yes an HTC but they never heard of it. I imagine then the carriers in the US and UK rebrand the HTCs like Orange do.

Well not exactly, they are re-branded but the company name is the same.

IE: HTC Desire = HTC Bravo and the HTC Desire HD = HTC Ace, also they have Thunderbolt, EVO and so on that are basic redesigns of the DHD based on Service provider orders.
 
Chutzpah: Google also wants 2.25% of every iPhone sale

It took a Techmeme news cycle for the import of Google's (GOOG) letter to the IEEE -- the nonprofit organization that sets technical standards for everything from AC/DC converters to Wi-Fi networks -- to sink in.

Early reports praised the company for joining Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT) in their calls for adherence to the "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" licensing terms that IEEE members promise to honor when they submit their patented technology for consideration as an industry standard.

It wasn't until FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller got his hands on the text and spotted the telling third paragraph that the tone of the news coverage changed. The paragraph states, in language it describes as "irrevocable," that when Google is through buying Motorola (MOT) and its 17,000 patents, it is prepared to ask for the same "maximum per-unit royalty of 2.25%" that Motorola is demanding of Apple for every iPhone sale....

More over at CNN Money

This must be a shocker, to Tim. I can not begin to imagen what Steve would have done with this bit of news
 
More over at CNN Money

This must be a shocker, to Tim. I can not begin to imagen what Steve would have done with this bit of news

If each of them demanded 2.25% every time a competitor tried to build a compatible device, the industry would grind to a halt.

I wonder if this is Google's sneaky way of proving a point.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X