At first I didn't understand what the article was on about, but I re-read it and understood what the criminals are up to.
If this crime is real and if as I suspect is specifically credit card fraud, it would then be committed by a very determined group of criminals who first obtain the cardholder's cellphone and landline numbers, the credit card details (card number, cardholder's name as it appears on the card, expiry date, the CCV number at the back, the billing address, and probably the credit limit as well), the criminals call the cardholder's cellphone and convince the cardholder to switch their cellphone off for several hours, the criminals then make one or more purchases via phone or the Internet such that a physical card is not required (also bypasses POS chip card PIN verification), the cardholder's bank detects suspicious purchases and attempts to contact the cardholder to find out if the cardholder made the purchases, meanwhile the syndicate has dispatched a corrupt Telkom technician to intercept or redirect any calls from the cardholder's bank and possibly pretend to be the cardholder. This last step would require patience and potentially hours of waiting for an incoming call from the bank, so I suspect call forwarding would be more likely than clip-on fraud, and the syndicate would have to have a plausible impersonator standing by to take the bank's call (same gender and able to imitate the cardholder's accent).
It all seems rather implausible, so if it is real, this crime is a lot more sophisticated than the garden variety criminal is able to conceive and execute, and requires loads of patience, which suggests that specific victims would be identified and targetted by a syndicate, perhaps requiring weeks of preparation. Fat cat execs/CEOs with very large credit card limits are probably in the cross-hairs of the syndicates.