NVIDIA Kepler GeForce GTX 680 Gets Benchmarked – Blows away the HD 7970

wily me

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
3,559
Reaction score
4
NVIDIA Kepler GeForce GTX 680 Gets Benchmarked – Blows away the HD 7970

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-kepler-geforce-gtx-680-benchmarked-blows-hd-7970/

Interesting!

GeForce-GTX-680-Benchmarks-635x476.jpg
 
If by "blows away" you mean around 20% better in benchmarks and TWIMTBP games, while less than 5% better in other games like COD3 and BF3, then yes I guess so...

edit: I've actually seen stock 7970's beat the GPU portion 3DMark11 score of the GTX690, so something isnt right with the above scores
 
Last edited:
If by "blows away" you mean around 20% better in benchmarks and TWIMTBP games, while less than 5% better in other games like COD3 and BF3, then yes I guess so...

edit: I've actually seen stock 7970's beat the GPU portion 3DMark11 score of the GTX690, so something isnt right with the above scores

Mhmm, we will have to wait and see don't we? ;)
 
Mhmm, we will have to wait and see don't we? ;)

I just ran 3DMark11 with stock GPU clocks, and I got 7762 GPU score on the performance preset setting. So I just beat the GTX680 with a stock 7970 :whistle:

edit: apparently I shouldnt have passed Grade 1, given my poor reading skills

:D
 
Last edited:
I just ran 3DMark11 with stock GPU clocks, and I got 7762 GPU score on the performance preset setting. So I just beat the GTX680 with a stock 7970 :whistle:

Sure, I believe you! Well done but I will still wait for the proper benchies to surface. ;)
 
Sure, I believe you! Well done but I will still wait for the proper benchies to surface. ;)

So will I, because I'm certain these benches are fake, or have been tampered with. I ran Heaven as well now, same settings 1920x1080 8xAA, and got 51.5fps vs the 42 the above link shows. Its possible they ran at a different tesselation setting though. 3DMark11 though, the preset is, well preset, so their score is waaaay off on that one
 
I just ran 3DMark11 with stock GPU clocks, and I got 7762 GPU score on the performance preset setting. So I just beat the GTX680 with a stock 7970 :whistle:

Did I miss something?

On the performance preset, the 680 got 9298 GPU score on the graph I'm reading.
 
If by "blows away" you mean around 20% better in benchmarks and TWIMTBP games, while less than 5% better in other games like COD3 and BF3, then yes I guess so...

edit: I've actually seen stock 7970's beat the GPU portion 3DMark11 score of the GTX690, so something isnt right with the above scores

@ Archer do you mean GTX 590 or GTX 690?
 
Care to explain teh COD / BF3 results while you're here? The site you linked to doesnt have the BF3 result, they removed it for some reason, so here it is - linky

Well its still better and that is without BF3 optimization. What's the problem?
 
Well its still better and that is without BF3 optimization. What's the problem?

The defintion of "blows away" clearly
COD the scores are equal...
BF3 is 3% more...

So lets even be optimistic and give Nvidia another 10% after driver tweaks, thats 13% more 2 months later (will actually be more, but thats not Nvidia fault)... Thats still hardly "blows away"
 
The defintion of "blows away" clearly
COD the scores are equal...
BF3 is 3% more...

So lets even be optimistic and give Nvidia another 10% after driver tweaks, thats 13% more 2 months later (will actually be more, but thats not Nvidia fault)... Thats still hardly "blows away"

So get to that site and shoot the originator not the messenger:D LOL.
Nothing to argue about, I am interested in real life feedback, who cares what brand is best as long as their is something affordable thats close or better than the best. I do like all the Nvidia extras like CUDA tho. ;)
 
I'm irritated because you copy paste blatantly incorrect headings without further thought, so you are perpetuating a mistruth. Go look at how techpowerup presented the info - thats unbiased reporting. If you are truly wanting real life feedback, wait for real reviews.
 
I'm irritated because you copy paste blatantly incorrect headings without further thought, so you are perpetuating a mistruth. Go look at how techpowerup presented the info - thats unbiased reporting. If you are truly wanting real life feedback, wait for real reviews.

Cry me a river. :D What was incorrect about those tests? Do you have a 680 to verify that the "reviewers" review is flawed, incorrect and full of mistruth's? We already saw you retract one claim or mistruth you made. ;)
 
I'm irritated because you copy paste blatantly incorrect headings without further thought, so you are perpetuating a mistruth. Go look at how techpowerup presented the info - thats unbiased reporting. If you are truly wanting real life feedback, wait for real reviews.

Pfft, AMD fanboys :p :D

Just kidding.
 
Cry me a river. :D What was incorrect about those tests? Do you have a 680 to verify that the "reviewers" review is flawed, incorrect and full of mistruth's? We already saw you retract one claim or mistruth you made. ;)

One last time...
BF has a 3% increase
COD has a 0% increase

In what universe does that blow away the competition?

As for the mistake I made, I corrected it. Judging by the above post you'd rather I keep hiding it? :rolleyes: I thought you wanted realt life feedback, and now you have it... I'm starting to smell a troll, prove me wrong
 
Any suggestions as to what the winner of the next poll should get?

;)

BTW, I'd love one.
 
One last time...
BF has a 3% increase
COD has a 0% increase

In what universe does that blow away the competition?

As for the mistake I made, I corrected it. Judging by the above post you'd rather I keep hiding it? :rolleyes: I thought you wanted realt life feedback, and now you have it... I'm starting to smell a troll, prove me wrong

GOD you are still feeling hurt by an internet "heading" that dared making a "perceived" negative comment against something you own?
Now you jump to trolling claims to save face or what? FFS. Grow a pair.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X