rpm
13-04-2006, 12:14 PM
http://mybroadband.co.za/nephp/?m=show&id=2507
View Full Version : US government wants PayPal records
Moederloos
13-04-2006, 12:41 PM
only a matter of time.
there was a paypal thread on myadsl a while back that mentioned just this type of thing happening in the near future.
probably looking for bin laden money that bush and his pals never got a a share of...
there was a paypal thread on myadsl a while back that mentioned just this type of thing happening in the near future.
probably looking for bin laden money that bush and his pals never got a a share of...
Syndyre
13-04-2006, 01:19 PM
The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) wants the San Jose, California-based "online wallet" to reveal the details of accounts linked to banks or credit cards in 35 countries, said Amanda Pires of PayPal. of...
Its bad enough if they want info from their own financial system but what gives them the right to foreign information just because it was processed by a us-based company?
Its bad enough if they want info from their own financial system but what gives them the right to foreign information just because it was processed by a us-based company?
Moederloos
13-04-2006, 01:21 PM
Its bad enough if they want info from their own financial system but what gives them the right to foreign information just because it was processed by a us-based company?
American governemnt agencies need rights? Seems I missed that one in the Iraq war.
;)
American governemnt agencies need rights? Seems I missed that one in the Iraq war.
;)
kilo39
13-04-2006, 02:05 PM
The quicker the americans get rid of bush and his cronies the better. Roll on the next american election. Bush is impacting on the freedom of the whole world and the internet - not just usa.
Rumsfied, bush and cheney are scum doing real harm to america and the world at large.
Rumsfied, bush and cheney are scum doing real harm to america and the world at large.
Moederloos
13-04-2006, 02:11 PM
Hillary clinton for next US president?
From Bush to a bush, perhaps?
;)
From Bush to a bush, perhaps?
;)
kilo39
13-04-2006, 02:34 PM
Worse fate = Condalisa Rice = more of the same
Moederloos
13-04-2006, 02:38 PM
Worse fate = Condalisa Rice = more of the same
yep, would not surprise me. Bush and his buddies are right now busy working out the final vote count for 2008. Wonder which state will get shafted this time?
yep, would not surprise me. Bush and his buddies are right now busy working out the final vote count for 2008. Wonder which state will get shafted this time?
kilo39
13-04-2006, 02:42 PM
:D
no joke.
no joke.
Syndyre
13-04-2006, 02:58 PM
American governemnt agencies need rights? Seems I missed that one in the Iraq war.
;)
Of course not, that would restrict the "war on terror" and the fight against "I-RAK", but you'd think they could get a PR dept to at least give off the right appearance.
;)
Of course not, that would restrict the "war on terror" and the fight against "I-RAK", but you'd think they could get a PR dept to at least give off the right appearance.
Moederloos
13-04-2006, 02:59 PM
Of course not, that would restrict the "war on terror" and the fight against "I-RAK", but you'd think they could get a PR dept to at least give off the right appearance.
except, try as you might, you cannot get **** to shine. And even if you somehow do manage that, it still stinks...
:p
except, try as you might, you cannot get **** to shine. And even if you somehow do manage that, it still stinks...
:p
Syndyre
13-04-2006, 03:06 PM
except, try as you might, you cannot get **** to shine. And even if you somehow do manage that, it still stinks...
:p
I don't know, depends on the audience, they re-elected Bush over there didn't they? :P
:p
I don't know, depends on the audience, they re-elected Bush over there didn't they? :P
kilo39
13-04-2006, 03:14 PM
I don't know, depends on the audience, they re-elected Bush over there didn't they? By a hairs breadth - following a campaign of disinformation, distruth and massive budgets.
i-Guru
13-04-2006, 03:17 PM
the devil you know, is better than the devil you don't....
Syndyre
13-04-2006, 03:30 PM
By a hairs breadth - following a campaign of disinformation, distruth and massive budgets.
Still, no matter how good your campaign is it's hard to cover up what Bush is, at least to most rational people. Tyranny of the majority anyone?
Still, no matter how good your campaign is it's hard to cover up what Bush is, at least to most rational people. Tyranny of the majority anyone?
Moederloos
13-04-2006, 03:44 PM
I don't know, depends on the audience, they re-elected Bush over there didn't they? :P
there is doubt in my mind over that. The final vote count may have shown him the winner, but were the correct votes counted?
there is doubt in my mind over that. The final vote count may have shown him the winner, but were the correct votes counted?
Syndyre
13-04-2006, 03:49 PM
Who knows, even saw an article in one of the US papers abt how the republicans are being investigated for jamming a democrat call centre so nothing would surprise me.
kilo39
13-04-2006, 04:00 PM
Still, no matter how good your campaign is it's hard to cover up what Bush is, at least to most rational people. Tyranny of the majority anyone? The win was less than one percent. Supposedly american elections won on budget - and bush campaign receiving money from 'dubious sources' - with the largest election budget ever. And they still only managed to win by less than 1% -. Perhaps there is hope - that bush and his cronies will be unseated.
Syndyre
13-04-2006, 04:04 PM
The win was less than one percent. Supposedly american elections won on budget - and bush campaign receiving money from 'dubious sources' - with the largest election budget ever. And they still only managed to win by less than 1% -. Perhaps there is hope - that bush and his cronies will be unseated.
They only win on budget because the voters are mindless drones that believe whatever the campaign ads tell them.
They only win on budget because the voters are mindless drones that believe whatever the campaign ads tell them.
Prometheus
13-04-2006, 04:57 PM
Everyone seems to forget that Wush never won, Gore backed out.
kilo39
14-04-2006, 12:33 AM
Everyone seems to forget that Wush never won, Gore backed out. Acceeded the win would be better terms. Gore was weak - he was under overwhelming attack from the bush camp - including the whole Florida fiasco run by his brother. It was a long time ago. The americans today are equally split with bush at an all time low - the more troops that die the weaker he will be - barring another 9/11 of course.
Prometheus
14-04-2006, 12:56 AM
Acceded = fancy name
One can hardly claim victory if the competition suddenly gave up. Fact remains that Wush was never really elected as a final vote count was never reached.
One can hardly claim victory if the competition suddenly gave up. Fact remains that Wush was never really elected as a final vote count was never reached.
ettubrute
14-04-2006, 01:02 AM
LOL! And we're complaining about fraud with our elections? :rolleyes: