Malema: Lift my suspension ... or else

jargon7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
Location
Johannesburg
http://goo.gl/zaFCf

Malema's lawyers have written a letter to the party demanding that the ANC withdraw the "banning order" because it may be both unconstitutional and in violation of the ANC's constitution.

On Wednesday the ANC's national disciplinary committee chairperson Derek Hanekom summarily suspended Malema from the party for calling President Jacob Zuma a dictator.

The Mail & Guardian understands Malema's lawyers wrote to the ANC late on Wednesday after Malema consulted with them.

Malema's lawyers are demanding that the ANC withdraw the suspension on the grounds that it was in violation of rule 25. 2 of the ANC's constitution, which states that the party cannot use disciplinary processes to stifle debate and suppress views.

If the ANC refuses to withdraw his suspension, Malema intends instituting legal action against the party, including approaching the Constitutional Court.

On Friday, Malema lambasted Zuma's leadership style describing him as a dictator of the worst kind.

Reacting to the ANC's decision to suspend Malema, constitutional law expert Pierre de Vos criticised the ANC's decision to suspend Malema without following proper procedures.

"President Jacob Zuma is not a person who seems to take kindly to criticism ... [He] seems to have learnt well from the 'mistakes' of Thabo Mbeki and he is taking no chances with those who might oppose him. Cut off their heads before they can gather steam, seems to be his motto.
 
So he supports Mugabe, then calls Zuma a dictator of the worsed kind.... lol
 
Wait what? He wants to approach the constitutional court because a rule of the ANC's constitution may have been violated? So now ANC constitution = SA constitution?
 
Wait what? He wants to approach the constitutional court because a rule of the ANC's constitution may have been violated? So now ANC constitution = SA constitution?

No, he's approaching the Constitutional court becuse he feels his freedom of speech has been violated or threatened by the ANC's constitution. In short, he's going to SA's highest court to [try] override the ANC's decisions.

I'm no expert, but I don't see how the con court has anything to do with memberships to an organization.
 
Malema should rather lobby Mbeki and challenge the ANC for hypocrisy, inconsistent and selective disciplinary processes. He will himself look like a hypocrite of course because he would to point out that he's been insulting leaders since Thabo Mbeki and nothing was done about it.
 
So he supports Mugabe, then calls Zuma a dictator of the worsed kind.... lol

Yeah, it makes absolutely no sense.

Wait what? He wants to approach the constitutional court because a rule of the ANC's constitution may have been violated? So now ANC constitution = SA constitution?

may be both unconstitutional and in violation of the ANC's constitution.
 
or else I'll out some of the ANC dirty laundry ?
I think this clown has some dirt on a few of the ANC high society. Why else would they tolerate his crap for so long?

And a "temporary" suspension - ni**er please :mad:
 
No, he's approaching the Constitutional court becuse he feels his freedom of speech has been violated or threatened by the ANC's constitution. In short, he's going to SA's highest court to [try] override the ANC's decisions.

I'm no expert, but I don't see how the con court has anything to do with memberships to an organization.

How has his freedom of speech been violated - he can still say what he wants (within the law). He just can't do it in certain places, i.e. whereever the ANC hangout.
 
Freedom of speech! wtf
He has defamed the president and Is stupid enough to engage constitutional court in private matter that does not fall within constitutional bounds. Stupidity surely knows no bounds.

Mugabe is dictator, that makes zuma what, a super dictator.

Sent from South Africas most popular smartphone BlackBerry
 
How has his freedom of speech been violated - he can still say what he wants (within the law). He just can't do it in certain places, i.e. whereever the ANC hangout.

No idea. I bearly understand Juluis on a normal day, let alone his stance on legal matters.

Here is the statement:

"An order purporting to ban Malema from making any public statements on any matter pertaining to the ANC infringes on Malema's right to freedom of expression"
 
Last edited:
Irony is the "final statement" that gets him out eventually is the most agreeable he has maid: "On Wednesday the ANC's national disciplinary committee chairperson Derek Hanekom summarily suspended Malema from the party for calling President Jacob Zuma a dictator."
 
No, he's approaching the Constitutional court becuse he feels his freedom of speech has been violated or threatened by the ANC's constitution. In short, he's going to SA's highest court to [try] override the ANC's decisions.

I'm no expert, but I don't see how the con court has anything to do with memberships to an organization.

Well that's my point. There's nothing stopping him from speaking his mind, and therefore his freedom of speech is not being suppressed. The ANC may be in violation of their own constitution, but that has nothing to do with the constitution of the country.
 
Well that's my point. There's nothing stopping him from speaking his mind, and therefore his freedom of speech is not being suppressed. The ANC may be in violation of their own constitution, but that has nothing to do with the constitution of the country.

Does anyone still think the ANC see the country seperate from themselves? This country IS ANC...
 
Were he suspended from his expulsion ..
Expelled from his suspension

Suspended from his suspension..?

This is a circus


Just freeze his income.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X