Russia to deliver weapons to Syria

marine1

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
50,703
Reaction score
3,232
Location
A black hole in the universe - JHB
I have not seen this posted:
Shocking.

http://www.news24.com/World/News/Russia-to-deliver-weapons-to-Syria-20120711


Moscow - Russia said on Wednesday it would fulfil a contract to deliver air defence systems to Syria and had no plans to impose an arms embargo on its Soviet-era ally despite growing pressure from the West.

"Russia has obligations before Syria relating to old contracts - contracts that were signed in 2008 and were later followed by new ones on air defence systems," the Russian Federal Service for Military Technical Co-operation's deputy chief Vyacheslav Dzirkaln said.

"They are being fulfilled and they will be fulfilled," he told Russian news agencies on the sidelines of the Farnborough Airshow near London.

"But we are not signing any new contracts at this stage," the senior arms export official added in comments echoing ones he had made earlier in the week.

Dzirkaln said Russia's decision not to sign new contracts with Syria while the fighting continued in no way spelled a shift in policy or a decision by Moscow to comply with a Western arms embargo of Assad's regime.

"One cannot possibly speak of us imposing an arms or military technology embargo on Syria," Dzirkaln was quoted as saying.

Russia last month tried sending a cargo ship to Syria with three repaired attack helicopters as well as elements of an air defence system for President Bashar Assad's regime.

The vessel was forced to return to its Arctic base in Russia after the mission was exposed by the US States Department and its British insurer ended up dropping cover.

Dzirkaln on Wednesday vowed to complete this shipment and stressed that most outstanding contracts now concerned air defence systems that were meant to protect Syria's border in accordance with international rules.

"We are delivering weapons and military technology of an exclusively defensive nature. This primarily concerns air defence systems but also some spare parts," he said.

Dzirkaln said Russia was now thinking up ways of delivering the three helicopters "without any losses to us and without any provocations by the interested parties."

Officials had earlier suggested that an option to send the parts by air had been dropped in favour of a new seafaring mission.
 
So what?

The US arms bahrain, whats the difference o wait the US has a base there and they say it's fine.

Both have bases in the countries.

You missed russia sending war ships to the syrian base, that would have been a bigger story :D.
 
Yeah, don't worry Marine... killadoob doesn't give a crap about muslims killing muslims... carry on.
It's only when evil scumbag westerners kill Muslims that we should get upset, remember?
 
Yeah, don't worry Marine... killadoob doesn't give a crap about muslims killing muslims... carry on.
It's only when evil scumbag westerners kill Muslims that we should get upset, remember?

Naaa bru if the US can arm bahrain then why can russia not arm syria?

Rules bud, gotta be consistent with them.
 
Naaa bru if the US can arm bahrain then why can russia not arm syria?

Rules bud, gotta be consistent with them.

it's not about consistency, it's about what's right. while we may think that there is hypocrisy in some users posts, we can't be hypocrites ourselves and defend what is happening in Syria simply because someone on the forum annoys us.

we ourselves need to be consistent in condemning evil
 
it's not about consistency, it's about what's right. while we may think that there is hypocrisy in some users posts, we can't be hypocrites ourselves and defend what is happening in Syria simply because someone on the forum annoys us.

we ourselves need to be consistent in condemning evil

Well if i look at the syrian situation as it stands it looks to me as both the syrian regime and the rebels are evil. So you are basically asking people to back someone evil in syria.

No one is defending the syrian regime but how can you want those rebels to take over when they are just as bad? I know some media outlets have made you think the rebels are good and the syrian regime are evil but it is far more complex than that.
 
it's not about consistency, it's about what's right. while we may think that there is hypocrisy in some users posts, we can't be hypocrites ourselves and defend what is happening in Syria simply because someone on the forum annoys us.

we ourselves need to be consistent in condemning evil

killadoob? Consistent? Bwaahahaha... there's a laugh.
 
I have not seen this posted:
Shocking.

http://www.news24.com/World/News/Russia-to-deliver-weapons-to-Syria-20120711


Moscow - Russia said on Wednesday it would fulfil a contract to deliver air defence systems to Syria and had no plans to impose an arms embargo on its Soviet-era ally despite growing pressure from the West.

"Russia has obligations before Syria relating to old contracts - contracts that were signed in 2008 and were later followed by new ones on air defence systems," the Russian Federal Service for Military Technical Co-operation's deputy chief Vyacheslav Dzirkaln said.

"They are being fulfilled and they will be fulfilled," he told Russian news agencies on the sidelines of the Farnborough Airshow near London.

"But we are not signing any new contracts at this stage," the senior arms export official added in comments echoing ones he had made earlier in the week.

Dzirkaln said Russia's decision not to sign new contracts with Syria while the fighting continued in no way spelled a shift in policy or a decision by Moscow to comply with a Western arms embargo of Assad's regime.

"One cannot possibly speak of us imposing an arms or military technology embargo on Syria," Dzirkaln was quoted as saying.

Russia last month tried sending a cargo ship to Syria with three repaired attack helicopters as well as elements of an air defence system for President Bashar Assad's regime.

The vessel was forced to return to its Arctic base in Russia after the mission was exposed by the US States Department and its British insurer ended up dropping cover.

Dzirkaln on Wednesday vowed to complete this shipment and stressed that most outstanding contracts now concerned air defence systems that were meant to protect Syria's border in accordance with international rules.

"We are delivering weapons and military technology of an exclusively defensive nature. This primarily concerns air defence systems but also some spare parts," he said.

Dzirkaln said Russia was now thinking up ways of delivering the three helicopters "without any losses to us and without any provocations by the interested parties."

Officials had earlier suggested that an option to send the parts by air had been dropped in favour of a new seafaring mission.

Well, contracts have been signed and Russia is going to meet them. We can argue ethics, but that will get nowhere. At least they are saying they may not be any future deals within the present climate.

And what we must understand is that Syria is Russia's vested interest in the region. They may be friendly with Iran, but Iran is not their lap dog. From a geo-strategic standpoint they cannot have Syria slip into the arms of the West. If Al-Assad is toppled and a West-leaning government is installed, Russia are out of the Middle East.

That is also why the US stands back and lets Bahrain do its thing and why it applies little to no pressure on the Saudis, who themselves are pretty harsh in their treatment of people and women. Saudi Arabia and Bahrain give the US some friends in a very important region.

Is it ethical? No. But it is politics and politics are dirty.
 
killadoob? Consistent? Bwaahahaha... there's a laugh.

Dude i am not the one who supports america, i am not the one who wants wikileaks to go down. That is all you bud :D. All marine and you do in these types of threads is talk about me because you honestly haven't got the slightest clue about these topics :D.

Each to their own i guess :p
 
I have no problems with either the Russians or the Yanks selling aircraft to bolster Syrian/Bahrains national defense force. I'll change my opinion once we see an F16 unleashed on a protesting crowd.
 
Dude i am not the one who supports america, i am not the one who wants wikileaks to go down. That is all you bud :D. All marine and you do in these types of threads is talk about me because you honestly haven't got the slightest clue about these topics :D.

Each to their own i guess :p
Riiiight......and you do?
Please man you are more blinded by your hate for anything west / Jew than anyone else her.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X