Eskom taken to task for broken promises
I respectfully disagree.
Eskom got where they are from Government finance. In other words public money.
Perhaps in Developed countries Privatisation may work, but Africa is another story.
All that Privatisation means is that the Government sells public assets to Shareholders who in turn Restructure the Company to maximise profits, leaving the consumer with higher prices and poorer service.
Telkom case in point.
Government could "allow" small entrepreneurs to evolve that can generate one or two Megawatts as a test, but who has the Capital to build Power Stations.
But I still think it is a bad idea.
There is so much emphasis on the Red System and Privatisation and I reckon it is all going to end up being a money making racket and Joe Public will be paying double and triple for Electricity before you know it.
It is best if Eskom is left to do what they always did and Government should rather stop interfering with 5 Year Moratorium's that was implemented by our Deputy President for the period 1998 to 2003. The result of that decision is why we are where we are today with diminished capacity.
Also the simple fact that Development is taking off and Government is also providing free electricity to millions of new homes.
This is the truth.
All they need to do is implement the R84 Billion set aside for Eskom and manage the capacity better.
I.E. Why not bring in legislation to prevent the use of the old fashioned light bulbs for a start. Promote Gas Cookers etc
Many of these ideas are already being reimplemented in Cape Town. Free Low Energy Light Bulbs and the swapping out of Twin Hot Plates for Gas Burners.
So many things that can be done before you take something that isn't really broken and try and fix it.
Government should rather focus on making that R84 Billion work for the country. It is our taxes in any event.
started the process of building peaking plants'
Ioannis Kessides, the lead economist for the development research group at the World Bank, told the committee that while Eskom runs relatively well, privatisation is the ultimate solution to the crises. He was, however, complimentary of the technology and the resources that Eskom employs.
I respectfully disagree.
Eskom got where they are from Government finance. In other words public money.
Perhaps in Developed countries Privatisation may work, but Africa is another story.
All that Privatisation means is that the Government sells public assets to Shareholders who in turn Restructure the Company to maximise profits, leaving the consumer with higher prices and poorer service.
Telkom case in point.
Government could "allow" small entrepreneurs to evolve that can generate one or two Megawatts as a test, but who has the Capital to build Power Stations.
But I still think it is a bad idea.
There is so much emphasis on the Red System and Privatisation and I reckon it is all going to end up being a money making racket and Joe Public will be paying double and triple for Electricity before you know it.
It is best if Eskom is left to do what they always did and Government should rather stop interfering with 5 Year Moratorium's that was implemented by our Deputy President for the period 1998 to 2003. The result of that decision is why we are where we are today with diminished capacity.
Also the simple fact that Development is taking off and Government is also providing free electricity to millions of new homes.
This is the truth.
All they need to do is implement the R84 Billion set aside for Eskom and manage the capacity better.
I.E. Why not bring in legislation to prevent the use of the old fashioned light bulbs for a start. Promote Gas Cookers etc
Many of these ideas are already being reimplemented in Cape Town. Free Low Energy Light Bulbs and the swapping out of Twin Hot Plates for Gas Burners.
So many things that can be done before you take something that isn't really broken and try and fix it.
Government should rather focus on making that R84 Billion work for the country. It is our taxes in any event.