Apple and Samsung prepare for jury

Sad thing is that after this is (finally) over, it wont be since whoever loses the case will likely just appeal it again or take it up to a higher court or something - at least to keep relevant for a little while longer
 
I think that the lawyers have spent more time baiting and sniping one another, than they actually did defending their cases... this has become tiresome.

I wonder if the timing of Google's ITC ban request will affect any Apple appeal should they lose...
 
“Rather than competing in the marketplace, Apple is seeking a competitive edge in the courtroom,” Verhoeven said. Apple thinks “it’s entitled to having a monopoly on a rounded rectangle with a large screen. It’s amazing really.”

Pathetic actually.
 
Blah Blah Apple :sick:. If you decide to take on a product that sells at record sales, won't you too compare your product to the competition.... OF COURSE!

The Galaxy S1 was nothing like the Iphone. Different icons, operating system, shape, speed, etc.
Yes they say some icons look close, like the dial button, but all the other phones in the world have sort-off the same dial button. Normally it's green with a phone on it.

Apple is only suing Samsung for the money (they know they have it) and that's that.
 
Apple did have an amazing insight - after years of other people competing in the market, they took big market share with the new format. Of course everybody tried to emulate. However Apple has certainly more than scored off their insight by now. Let's move on.
 
By the time this is settled, whatever they were arguing about will be outdated. Well mabey not in Apples case - as they like to rework the same thing a few times.
 
Google's ITC ban request? Link please?

See here:

Mobile phone manufacturer Motorola Mobility is seeking a ban on the import of Apple devices to the US, claiming that some features on the tech giant’s devices infringe its patents.

The company has filed a suit with the US International Trade Commission (ITC), claiming Apple has infringed seven of its patents, including email notification, the Siri voice recognition programme, phone/video players and location reminders.

This is the second patent infringement case Motorola Mobility, which was recently acquired by Google, has filed against Apple. A ruling expected on the first case on 24 August and, if made in Motorola’s favour, it could see a US import ban imposed on the iPhone. However, the second suit goes even further, encompassing the iPad and Mac computers as well.

In a statement issued to IT Pro, Motorola said: “We would like to settle these patent matters, but Apple’s unwillingness to work out a license leaves us little choice but to defend ourselves and our engineers’ innovations.”

Apple had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.

The latest suit is just one of many patent infringement cases currently making their way through

court. Apple is currently suing Samsung, also via the US ITC, for infringing a number of its patents with regard to the Korean firm’s Android smartphones. In turn, Samsung is suing Apple for infringing its wireless technology patents.

Kathleen Fox Murphy, a specialist technology patent lawyer at Taylor Wessing told IT Pro: “Competition in the smartphone market is fierce, particularly with different smartphone companies offering phones with similar features. Patent infringement actions where injunctions are possible are useful in the fight for market share.

“Bringing an action before the US ITC in an attempt [to] obtain a ban on US imports is a common tactic in the smartphone wars. Whether or not a company is successful in obtaining a ban will depend on the facts of a particular case.”
 
Last edited:
Interesting how when Apple took MS to court over copying its GUI, the court ruled that Apple can't actually patent "the GUI" as protected IP. Even though MS had done pretty much exactly what Samsung has done here, copied the look and feel but built their own OS under the hood.

Having said that, the Wave and bada OS are clearly pure iClones, cut and dry. And also some of Samsungs best work, btw, despite not doing particularly well in the market compared to the glut of Androids. Interesting to see what the justice system decides this time around.
 
Apple uses Lumia as example to Samsung: Not every phone has to look like an iPhone

Shame.

It looks like Samsung really had some hardcore iPhone envy.

Apple tells the jury and Samsung how 'others' compete. Look here -> http://bit.ly/PYRm1F

Click here -> http://bit.ly/PGdhsH for more of the information from the court room. Some damning evidence.
 
I'm going to patent the men's and women's bathroom logos. now you all have to change the plaques on your bathrooms. O and you cant put your new logo's on square plaques, I patented that too.

since I am the first to do so, the fact that the logo and the square has existed for many years before I patented it, is not relevant to your defence.


Stupid patent law. time to scrap it.
 
Really getting tired of all this patent abuse, let's hope google doesn't go power crazy with Motorola
 
Shame.

It looks like Samsung really had some hardcore iPhone envy.

Apple tells the jury and Samsung how 'others' compete. Look here -> http://bit.ly/PYRm1F

Click here -> http://bit.ly/PGdhsH for more of the information from the court room. Some damning evidence.

Because WP is doing such a great job competing... Despite being outsold by Symbian... Of course Apple would choose a manufacturer that is not relevant to them. I wonder why they didn't reference Blackberry? Maybe because they too are guilty of taking a few ideas from them?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X