'Hypersensitive' Wi-Fi hater loses case against fiendish DEVICES

B

bekdik

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
12,860
Reaction score
20
Location
I exist only in my own mind ...
Firstenberg argues that hyper-sensitivity to electromagnetic fields is a disability

Veteran Campaigner Against Stuff Arthur Firstenberg won a case last week, and lost one too, but there won't be much celebrating as even the victory was a false one.

The case he lost started in 2010, when Firstenberg claimed his neighbour's Wi-Fi was sneaking through the mains wires into his house to keep him awake at night. The victory, meanwhile, was a decision in the 2008 case that people with disabilities do need protecting against telecommunications companies – but that case now goes back to the case's original judge, who has already decided that electromagnetic hyper sensitivity isn't a real disability, as the SantaFe New Mexican reports.


Firstenberg argues that hyper-sensitivity to electromagnetic fields is a disability, and therefore the "Americans with Disabilities Act" requires the city of Santa Fe (which is currently deploying Wi-Fi) and AT&T (which would like to upgrade its network) to work around him. An earlier ruling had decreed that the federal Telecommunications Act pre-empted the Disabilities Act, and that ruling has now been overturned, so it comes down to the whether the disability is real.
Click to expand...

One wonders what a court would find in RSA
 
What a load of horseradish.

I'm hypersensitive to bull****, can I sue most people on this blessed earth too?
 
Good thing there isn't a giant ball of electromagnetic radiation nearby to our planet, or else we'd all be screwed.
 
This moron sounds like our local "hyper-sensitive" nutjob...Tracey-Lee Dorny if memory serves me correctly.
 
CraZee said:
Good thing there isn't a giant ball of electromagnetic radiation nearby to our planet, or else we'd all be screwed.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO!

These people speak the biggest load of carp under the sun. Hypersensitivity to wifi.. my ass. More like hypochondria and looking for an excuse.
 
In before Karl Muller posts some of his longwinded BS.
 
ToxicBunny said:
I'd forgotten about his crackpottery...... I need a laugh, please Karl come post in this thread.
Click to expand...

Scoff as you like, but there is proof

A wireless router was turned on for 30 minutes in a wooded area and this was the result:

firedamagemicaimg_0789.jpg
 
Jab said:
Scoff as you like, but there is proof

A wireless router was turned on for 30 minutes in a wooded area and this was the result:
Click to expand...

But somebody forgot to mention that the generator powering it exploded :D
 
Damn, I was hoping you wouldn't find that test result :(

Just don't go look for Tunguska please... we want to keep the early WiFi tests "secret"
 
I know someone like that in my complex. She has put special paint on all her walls and stuff on her windows to block all wireless waves entering her property. Funny stuff.
 
Cius said:
I know someone like that in my complex. She has put special paint on all her walls and stuff on her windows to block all wireless waves entering her property. Funny stuff.
Click to expand...

Special paint?

Seriously, such a thing exists that actually works?
 
I'm sure the judge and lawyer were having a laugh the whole time. They both know they have to entertain the client's... antics... for the sake of fairness, but both know its a complete farce.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X