Don't you think you are all being a bit cynical.
Zim has inflation of over 1000%, we have inflation of under 6%.
In Zimbabwe, it is impossible to get various forms of food for months on end, while in SA you can get just about anything you want.
The problem of Zimbabwe is Bob. I do not believe that in the ranks of SA, we have anyone quite so meglomaniac. Perhaps Zuma might exhibit such behaviour were he to get into power, but at the moment, that seems quite unlikely.
If we work on the happy premise that our next president will be someone like Phumzile or Cyril, the future of SA should be safe for another five to ten years - at least from the crippling corruption that Zimbabwe faces.
I also don't think that the emerging black middle class would allow someone to remain in power that long, while destroying the country - they have too much to lose, and would oppose such a move.
While in SA, the labour movement is also under pressure to delink itself from the ruling elite, the consequences would be far different, since we have a working democracy.
Let's get this clear: Zimbabwe has never had a free and fair election ever! From the time that Britain handed over Rhodesia, and the first election was held, there was voter intimidation and corruption. For example: Zanu-PF spread the rumour that they had imported a machine from Romania which told them who citizens voted for, and if you didn't vote for Zanu, they would come after you. (Source: P. Stiff; Cry Zimbabwe).
The differences between ZA and Zim are great; much, much greater than the similarities.