South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I never could understand why Virgin chose CellC with the least amount of network coverage and the least amount of innovation, but I can understand that CellC needs to batten down its hatches and devolve in order to avoid the future [which is not necessarily 3G, it could easily be mobile WiMax]...So for now the mobile broadband arena will be mainly a two-horse race, especially since CellC’s reluctance to roll out mobile broadband also disqualifies Virgin from playing in this space.
Simple, Cell C needed the partnership, Vodacom and MTN didn't.I never could understand why Virgin chose CellC with the least amount of network coverage and the least amount of innovation
Surely mobile broadband from both MTN and Vodacom is innovative?Simple, Cell C needed the partnership, Vodacom and MTN didn't.I never could understand why Virgin chose CellC with the least amount of network coverage and the least amount of innovatio
I don't really see anything the other operators are doing as innovation.
Finger slip fixed.Surely mobile broadband from both MTN and Vodacom is innovative?
PS: You've truncated my post into a spelling error in your quote.
IMO both MTN & Vodacom [and their customers for that matter] have been guinea pigs for 3G|HSDPA, IOW IMO both MTN & Vodacom have been experimented upon in the continued development of 3G|HSDPA...Finger slip fixed.
I don't see that as an innovation. The broadband technology itself is an innovation, but cell operators buy it. What was MTN and Vodacom's involvement in the research and development of EDGE, 3G and HSDPA?