Fake winners(?), dubious pricing to con subscription to content service

ajax

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
577
Location
Stellenbosch
We regularly see complaints about content services and how subscribers are not aware that they subscribed. And it's no surprise, given the dubious tactics some employ to lure unsuspecting internet surfers to their so-called "content service".

Clicking this link takes one to a landing page of theirs.

Buon_1a.jpg

Now the WASPA code of conduct states that:
6.2.6. The price for a premium rated service must be easily and clearly visible in all advertisements. The price must appear with all instances of the premium number display
The price is not visible anywhere.
After clicking "ok" on the "Congratulations" popup, and only after scrolling down to the bottom of the page, can one see in grey that this is a subscription service and the price is R5 per day (images shown further below).

After clicking on "Don't Miss Your Chance!" it redirects to a page where you must enter your cell number to "Win a new Ipad" and to get, as they call it, "cool content" :sick:

Buon_1b.jpg

But the possibility of winning the Ipad is just a way to lure the user into subscribing to their junk - always anyway available through a few keystrokes in Google.
Note however another breach of the regulations, the price has suddenly gone up to R6 per day! So which is it?

In addition, I believe the winner(s) are fake. Alison Smith, here form Johannesburg is seen winning an Ipad.

Buon_1c2.jpg

However, if you click here for another landing page of theirs we see Alison Smith again, but here she is from Durban and she has won an Iphone! Also note the premium number is not displayed next to the small grey font display of subscription service (see regulations again above).

Buon_1d.jpg

It is either an unbelievable stroke of coincidence/luck, or these winners are just fake winners to lure a "subscription" to their junk.
I have lodged a WASPA complaint accordingly.

Any supersleuths out there to dig further into the "winners?"

I would not have discovered the above without articles from Julius Cobbett from Moneyweb here, here, here and here.

EDIT: Fixed some attachments.
 
Last edited:
I found Alison Smith's twin sister, Megan, also winning an ipad on www.mobilegiftaway.com:
fake.JPG

My Laura did not like Bellville so she moved to St Petersburg:
laura.moved.JPG
 
Ah thought you maybe back searched the image instead of just googling the name.

main-qimg-b27401dff7fc59bff1f3e8ca0b2fdc7b


;)
 
It works like a charm and I use it all the time eg. when I'm looking for a better quality version of pic X I just throw it at Google. :D

I normally use Tineye. Will compare them when I have some time.
 
ROLFMAO! Awesome, ld13! For sure now this is fake!! :D
I will submit this to WASPA as well.

Try loading the Laura page via different ISPs and via proxies to watch her insta-move all over the place... :D

You Could Be Today's Lucky Winner in Cape Town!
...
Last months winners:
Laura White
Cape Town

You Could Be Today's Lucky Winner in Bellville!
...
Last months winners:
Laura White
Bellville

You Could Be Today's Lucky Winner in St Petersburg!
...
Last months winners:
Laura White
St Petersburg

Edit:
 
Last edited:
I have submitted the above URL's and screenshots in a pdf to WASPA.

@ld13, where does that landing page from the Netherlands go to after clicking "Beantwoord de simpile prijsvraag!"? I get a server error - I assume it's because this site is in the Netherlands and they detect my IP address as South African?
I just wonder who is behind all these scams. My guess is Sprint Media, but I stand to be corrected.
 
I am sure that the Advertising Standards Authority would be interested in the false advertising going on. Usually costs the Company concerned a Lawyers fees to defend.
 
The use of persona to promote a company through social media, promotions or testimonials is common and is not limited to just a single industry.

The insurance industry loves to use them.

@ajax Buongiorno is our industries untouchable and it really gets me. They are one of the least compliant WASPS and the fact that they get away is very well known.
 
@ld13, where does that landing page from the Netherlands go to after clicking "Beantwoord de simpile prijsvraag!"? I get a server error

Ditto.

All of these landing pages submit the "prize" form button to a vialeads.com link and then redirects you to the appropriate page - for us it is the 35050.co.za website. Still have to play around to see where it would normally lead when accessed from a non-SA ip.
 
Although the ads themselves are not placed by the company you get subscribed to, this adjudicator's report by WASPA dismisses any defence that would argue that the company you get subscribed to is not liable because the ads were placed by a 3rd party.

The IP alleges that they at no point breached the Code. A particularly interesting aspect of
their defence was that the company they utilised for doing their marketing breached the
Code and thus they cannot be blamed. I feel it is worthwhile to address this point upfront. In
my view if you are bound to comply with the Code in respect of all aspects of your offering
of a service covered by the Code, and if you choose to outsource the provision of aspects of
that service to a third party, you remain liable for all aspects of that service whether
outsourced or not. If this were not the case WASPA members could merely outsource the
entire service offering to a third party and avoid liability. I accordingly dismiss all arguments
posited by the IP that they cannot be held liable for breaches of the code by their chosen
service provider. It is the IP’s responsibility to ensure compliance with the code by their
service provider’s be this by contractual obligations being placed upon such organisations or
be it by a thorough and continual due diligence process. Ignorance of the marketing
company’s actions is thus also an insufficient defence in my view
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X