South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The protocol according to Sihra's statement proposes a regional government structure that will own, implement, control and operate the EASSy system that was rejected as being inappropriate, unworkable and in direct conflict with the deregulated telecom environment and national regulations. The promoters say the protocol does not have the buy-in of all the stakeholders, most notably, the region's telecommunications operators and certain governments.
I still don't understand why South Africa has to share a cable. We can do this alone! We can spare a dime for shared connections at a later date, the time for charity is not now. Charity starts at home anyway and having to field this amount of red tape is insane.
I am sure there are enough business here who would be interested in getting the SOUTH AFRICAN HIGHSPEED GATEWAY TO THE WORLD going...
Where is our sense of innovation? We should be in space already FFS!
me too - hopefully they'll be stuck up his arse and lit.I'm still waiting for Roy's fireworks.
Reality check: AFAIK Tunisia has been rated better at ICT than SA for the last couple|few years - SA has slipped into mediocrity and no longer leads the way forward, and for that we can solidly blame Telkodemonopolies & guavamint for broadband price fixing [includes SAT3 as an international broadband access medium]...Good to see other folks also seeing the problem. This country has more resources and more creative people than anywhere else in Africa purely because our education etc are/used to be better. We must be a leader, not a follower nation! Government should allow private companies to endeavour into getting global links up...
I still don't understand why South Africa has to share a cable. We can do this alone!
Kenya's lone fibre optic cable is expected to cost $110m and would run from Mombasa to Fujairah in the Gulf of Oman
Please no! That sort of thing cannot be allowed ever again. Think of the mess we're in now with telkom and their landing rights to SAT3.That's not a lot of money in the general scheme of things! One would expect a telco to be able to finance something like that itself.
True, Telkodemonopolies does not have any effective competition, so allowing Telkodemonopolies, or for that matter NeOTel, to build & pay for & monopolise yet another submarine cable, would land us back where we are now - price fixing.Please no! That sort of thing cannot be allowed ever again. Think of the mess we're in now with telkom and their landing rights to SAT3.That's not a lot of money in the general scheme of things! One would expect a telco to be able to finance something like that itself.
We'd need a lot more than the 2 national operators we currently have if we want to avoid being extorted.