South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
True that there are web apps & services out there that aren't [relatively] bandwidth intensive, another good example IMO is GMail and in general the use of AJAX, but whilst Telkodemonopolies actively limits bandwidth intensive applications & services South Africans are still unable to explore, inovate and develop similar bandwidth-intensive services targeted at South Africans - specifically due to the extremely exorbitant cost of local bandwidth and hosting fees - why else are so many .co.za sites hosted on overseas servers...I'm not sure if this is necessarily true. There are tons and tons of web-based applications out there that are not as bandwidth intensive as youtube, but still count as 'web2.0' - whatever that means in this day and age.
Bandwidth does not equate to 2.0 status. It helps, but there are tons of other factors to take into consideration. Look at digg for instance. That's definitely News 2.0, but is the app bandwidth hungry like youtube? Nope.
Hi LycanthropeCaps take away the entire experience of THE INTERNET. If anything, Telkom and ICASA restrict the growth of the South African internet market... After all, even MyADSL is hosted internationally due to the high costs
What's even worse is that we spend time ranting about capping and costs and don't realize it's almost totally a waste of our energy and our life for that matter.![]()