As per above.
Is it just me or do iBurst think that I'm not going to notice 80mb which they haven't given me? Or are they implimenting negative carry-over as well?
I think that for some reason they have now calculated your entire cap as MB, instead of just the additional bandwidth, which would correctly only be 0.48GB.
3500MB = 3.42GB
It should be 3GB + 0.48GB = 3.48
Not much of a difference in the end, but maybe they should take note
http://www.mybroadband.co.za/nephp/?m=show&id=5776 confirms that the additional data is set at 500MB and not 512MB (which does not make IT sense but then what recently has made sense from this company??)
Well hes saying the exact same thing I am wrt to final amount, it should be 3572 /1024 = 3.488GB
Hopefully they do actually fix this, otherwise I'll have to phone them about it, and I'll have to go through my MTU settings and Dr.TCP again before they pick up a calculator to fix it. We're being robbed of 70mb here :O Thats big stuff in SA..
They do state the packages as 3500MB and not 3.5GB. So technically the 3.42GB on th report is correct. I did suspect that this was going to happen when they continually reported the packages in MB size rather than GB size.
I got my 500Mb but I had to do some math because I carried over a sh1tload of bandwidth, am sitting on just under 6 gigs to burn. So ja, they did give it to me although the bandwidth report sent on Sunday said I didn't get any...
Interestingly I as yet don't have my bandwidth report.
EDIT: Went to check on the site and indeed I have 9.28GB. They should have made it absolutely clear that by 9500MB they meant 9500MB and not 9.5GB. Well played iBurst.
They can't just change everything over to MB because they are adding such small amounts to our accounts. The 9GB should still be 9GB like it always was.
Biggest effect on the 9G accounts, I'd say give them a call.
I finally installed Splinter Cell Chaos Theory yesterday and one of the patches was in the order of 180MB. I'd rather download that at 1Mbps than 64kbps.