Proposed name changes in Durbs go Bos!

Shake&Bake

Party Liaison
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
22,258
Reaction score
1,882
Location
Cape Town
Durban - Shoppers fled and shop-owners hurriedly lowered their shutters as several hundred stick- and knobkerrie-wielding protesters ran down Durban's five-lane Broad street on Tuesday.

All these changes are peeving me off. In CT as well there have been mutterings. But it seems the Durban folk are going woes. From News24.
 
I wonder if the isiXhosa lead ANC leadership are trying to goad the Zulu population into doing something rash by provicating them with this.
 
I am gonna invent a assegai thingy you can mount to your 4X4 and then we can riot too! In style, with aircon - the civilized way.

:D
 
I wonder if the isiXhosa lead ANC leadership are trying to goad the Zulu population into doing something rash by provicating them with this.
That should be AmaXhosa. ;)
 
Good, i am glad that the residents of DBN are finally standing up to the ANC.

"History doesn't only belong to the ANC". As a banner said today at the march.
 
No, he was writing in English. The term is Xhosa. If he was writing in Xhosa it would be AmaXhosa. When you write in English do you refer to the Germans as Deutsche?

Lol, but he said isiXhosa which AFAIK in my anglo african mind refers to the language. But your point taken.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if they are still going to drop the word Natal from Kwazulu Natal?
The name is already *510 years old. :rolleyes:

*Vasco da Gama of Portugal saw the coast of Natal on Christmas Day 1497. Christmas in Portuguese is 'Natal', which gave rise to the original name for the region.
 
Interesting BTTB, didn't know that. Thanks

You are welcome. :)
Actually a lovely piece of history that could be thwarted by political ends.

I am glad the proposed name changes have come into the spotlight.
As long as it is debated and thought out and people understand the names they change and why.
If names are just changed because it is popular then our Government has learnt nothing from History, which wouldn't surprise me and they/we are doomed to repeat its mistakes.
 
I have a question....These name changes in Durban, did the ANC also ask for the name of Durban to change?

That would be interesting, because according to history, Shaka gave the piece of land on which Durban resides (well I dont think the entire durban), to the british, so that they could trade and so on.

So does that not mean that, Durban actually belongs to the british?
 
I have a question....These name changes in Durban, did the ANC also ask for the name of Durban to change?

That would be interesting, because according to history, Shaka gave the piece of land on which Durban resides (well I dont think the entire durban), to the british, so that they could trade and so on.

So does that not mean that, Durban actually belongs to the british?

"25-mile strip of coast a hundred miles in depth."

I would say not.
Does pose an interesting historical agreement between the then leader of the Zulu Nation, namely Shaka himself and the party that was led by *Fynn.

*See Wiki on Durban.

During a meeting of 35 white residents in Fynn's territory on June 23, 1835, it was decided to build a capital town and name it "d'Urban" after Sir Benjamin d'Urban, then governor of the Cape Colony
Basically if that meeting didn't happen in 1835 what would Durban or Shaka's Grant/Gift look like today.
Whatever the Government of the day chooses, white man's history in South Africa is so intertwined we cannot deny it nor should we. :)
 
Last edited:
I have a question....These name changes in Durban, did the ANC also ask for the name of Durban to change?

That would be interesting, because according to history, Shaka gave the piece of land on which Durban resides (well I dont think the entire durban), to the british, so that they could trade and so on.

So does that not mean that, Durban actually belongs to the british?

It is already called eTikwini or something...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X