Why politics and science should be kept seperate

w1z4rd

Karmic Sangoma
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
52,146
Reaction score
8,340
Location
127.0.0.1
"President of the Czech Republic Vaclav Klaus has published an article in the Financial Times in which he seems to equate the current global warming debate with totalitarian thought control: 'The dictates of political correctness are strict and only one permitted truth, not for the first time in human history, is imposed on us. Everything else is denounced ... The scientists should help us and take into consideration the political effects of their scientific opinions. They have an obligation to declare their political and value assumptions and how much they have affected their selection and interpretation of scientific evidence.' At the end of the article he proposes several suggestions to improve the global climate debate, including this point: 'Let us resist the politicization of science and oppose the term "scientific consensus," which is always achieved only by a loud minority, never by a silent majority.'"

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9deb730a-19ca-11dc-99c5-000b5df10621.html

Threat to democracy? No.

Threat to scientifically illiterate politicians? Maybe.
 
So refreshing to read something from a politician who has a mind of his own, and is not afraid to express it.

Not that it will be enough to stop the Great Global Warming Scam. But every little bit helps.
 
Now all we need is more people who know what they are talking about ;) I see the counter propaganda is working working well on people who dont understand science ... Go oil companies!
 
Adolf Hitler said:
Research must remain free and unfettered by any State restriction. The facts which it establishes represent Truth, and Truth is never evil.

:p
 
'The dictates of political correctness are strict and only one permitted truth, not for the first time in human history, is imposed on us. Everything else is denounced

The guy has been reading my posts :cool: :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X