How do Telkom’s WiMax offerings compare on price?

so wait, what would be the point of getting a standalone WIMAX solution i.e. without any GB's? Will we be given choices of which ISP to use for WIMAX in future?
 
omw... ADSL *the* most expensive??

Sure, you get that value-added line rental service, but DAYAMN...
 
Well the initial Cost/Mbps/GB may be higher than iBust , Vodacom and MTN it would be nice to see a Cost/Mbps/GB on acctual throughput. I've never seen anything close to advertised on Vodacom or MTN's HSDPA ?
 
so wait, what would be the point of getting a standalone WIMAX solution i.e. without any GB's? Will we be given choices of which ISP to use for WIMAX in future?
You will be able to buy your GB's from any ADSL ISP...uses the same realm...
 
Well the initial Cost/Mbps/GB may be higher than iBust , Vodacom and MTN it would be nice to see a Cost/Mbps/GB on acctual throughput. I've never seen anything close to advertised on Vodacom or MTN's HSDPA ?
This is indeed what one should be looking at...we hope to do testing again later this year which should give this info...
 
And where is the cost of entry?

Aka "installation fees" and the fees paid for the hardware (ADSL modems are cheap compared to HSDPA and iBurst)?
 
This is indeed what one should be looking at...we hope to do testing again later this year which should give this info...

If you can't get Telkom's WiMax in ADSL enabled areas, how are you going to lab test it?

Just a thought... :rolleyes:
 
RPM, shouldn't your comparison just stick to the Telkom do Products?

That would put Telkom's 2Gb offer at R485/Mbps/Gb

And put Telkom's 3Gb offer at R56/Mbps/Gb, which by your defintion would be the best value!!!

And then TelkomInternet generally allow twice the number of gigs on their products .

And then who get's full speed regularly on HSDPA or ibUrst?

The real problem here is that you cannot use Cost per Mbps per Gb as a reliable basis for the comparitive valuation of capped services

In an uncapped world, it would make perfect sense. But 3gb is 3gb regardless of the speed. While there is some benefit to doing things a little faster, that marginal benefit is a great deal less than the ratio of the download speed.

In our rationed world, most broadband users would choose to double their caps long before choosing to double their speed.
 
Last edited:
Hi Gatecrasher

We felt that it would be a better comparison to use DSL services with the same speed as WiMax. Since WiMax offer 512 Kbps I think it is best to compare it with DSL512. Since Telkom does not have a DSL512 service with a 1 GB offering we opted for the Do 384 service…
 
I can't get over the 1gb, 2gb, 3gb cap. Honestly, what must I do with 1gb?
 
just a pitty when calling telkom nobody can tell you which areas is covered by there wimax so its as good as saying we can give you a fiber optic cable straight into our mainframe 'if you in the right area' but they dont say which area.... and yes i know they say pretoria but on asking them where in pretoria they dont know...
 
Hi Gatecrasher

We felt that it would be a better comparison to use DSL services with the same speed as WiMax. Since WiMax offer 512 Kbps I think it is best to compare it with DSL512. Since Telkom does not have a DSL512 service with a 1 GB offering we opted for the Do 384 service…


By that logic you should then use 3G, rather than HSDPA in your comparisons.
 
‘Stand alone access’ is priced at R 240-00 per month

you have to pay air rental!!! OMG :eek::eek:
 
‘Stand alone access’ is priced at R 240-00 per month

you have to pay air rental!!! OMG :eek::eek:

Wheels and roundabouts. You'll pay for access to the network and then you'll pay +-R70/Gb. On other netwroks, the access might be "free", but then you'll pay R200/Gb. Makes things fairly comparable on small usage, but for large usage the first model is much more affordable.
 
There is no line rentals added to the telkom figures. They should be, as you cannot have adsl without it.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X