South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
No 3G means the suck...
It is a worldwide standard.3G is not a US standard.
No it won't.When the phone hits Europe it will most likely get 3G.
Yes the current market does need 3G. And they originally planned to have a CDMA system that is faster than the GSM system, but Verizon turned them down. Cingular took them up instead.3G can be enabled by the installation of one tiny little chip. Apple will cater for the market at hand, and their current market does not need 3G.
It is a worldwide standard.
No it won't.
Yes the current market does need 3G. And they originally planned to have a CDMA system that is faster than the GSM system, but Verizon turned them down. Cingular took them up instead.
Not having 3G is only a problem if you have no WiFi arround you. Who cares about cellular standards when you can get over 100 Mbps from WiMax? Not that the phone supports that, but WiFi is still faster and I'm sure the next gen iPhone will support WiMax.
Where are the specs?The EU iPhone does have 3G
They are talking to Vodafone, but no deal has been struck yet. Hope they don't put that red sticker on it.Well from engadgenet's recent rumours about the european launch it seems that it will be partnering with vodafone and *drumroll* have 3g(hsdpa) support
Till I heard that I was completely uninterested about the phone.
But yeah....since itll have 3g......im starting to get a bit interested.
Though there is that thing it seems that you actually have ot PAY for a ringtone
It’s been [anticipated/hyped] as the biggest product launch of all times. Everybody have been talking about it for ages, from enthusiasts to the most respected journalists. Has the wait for Apple’s iPhone been worth the wait?
More...
They are talking to Vodafone, but no deal has been struck yet. Hope they don't put that red sticker on it.
Vodafone Live! iPhoneOh God no
![]()
he Apple iPhone is available at two price levels, $499 for a 4GB version and $599 for an 8GB version. Either way you're talking about a good chunk of change for a phone. Apple has justified the pricing level by pointing out that some individuals purchase both a smart phone for around $300 and an iPod for around $200. We feel that fewer people than you would expect spend that much on both a phone and an iPod, but of course those who do are the market that Apple will be going after first.
For the vast majority of folks, the iPhone is, and will remain, a premium product that's beyond their price range. If you are looking for smart phone features (such as a decent music player and video support), you can pick up a smart phone such as the Palm Treo 750 for under $200, with a two year contract. When you consider the fact that you are signing up for the same two year contract with the iPhone and are paying $599 for the phone, it's clear that it is not a bargain. We imagine, though that if this first version of the iPhone is successful, you'll see more models at more reasonable pricing levels. Anyone without a fat wallet may want to wait for those future models.
Moot point - all camera phone cameras are crap.b] Crap camera [2 Megapixels vs. 5 Megapixels out now]
Cant really judge it? Why not?e] No hardware keyboards and such, so you are entirely dependent on the touch screen [touchscreen keyboard in other words] . I can not really judge this "feature",
They are talking to Vodafone, but no deal has been struck yet. Hope they don't put that red sticker on it.
And thus no crappy third party apps which is probably what Apple is trying to avoid at this early stage.No proper SDK... thus no cool third party apps...
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/fast-and-furious/no-iphone-sdk-means-no-iphone-killer-apps-267899.php