http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/Politics/0,,2-7-12_2144369,00.html
Ok so I read this story and it got me thinking about where we draw the line in these things.
So the way I read this, is that this chappy had the hots for this chick and approached her over the phone with the view to getting jiggy.
If she was not keen, all she has to do is say No! Instead from what I read she decided that No is not enough and is obviously so freaked out by the idea of getting jiggy, that she claims sexual harassement.
If the guy would not take No as an answer and kept going and pushing and phoning and all that, fine, it's harassment, if not surely she is over reacting?
From what I read in the article it seems she is over reacting.
Ok so I read this story and it got me thinking about where we draw the line in these things.
... an allegation that while they were at a hotel in Klerksdorp he molested [her] with the words: "I've got the hots for you."
Tsamai has claimed that on June 2 in Klerksdorp, Harding approached her with a view to sexual intimacy.
She claimed also that Harding phoned her with the request to have sex with him in his hotel room, and that he told her: "I've got the hots for you."
So the way I read this, is that this chappy had the hots for this chick and approached her over the phone with the view to getting jiggy.
If she was not keen, all she has to do is say No! Instead from what I read she decided that No is not enough and is obviously so freaked out by the idea of getting jiggy, that she claims sexual harassement.
If the guy would not take No as an answer and kept going and pushing and phoning and all that, fine, it's harassment, if not surely she is over reacting?
From what I read in the article it seems she is over reacting.