eagle-slayor's Phone News blog discussions

eagle-slayor

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
890
Reaction score
0
Location
Bedfordview, from Portugal
Nokia N95 motion sensor

Many people already know this, but I'd like to say again that Nokia has been hiding or not using their hardware enough, it's seems to be our responsibility to tweak our phones...
Check the video: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l22TOVxFhJ4"]YouTube - N95 motion sensor[/ame]

Enjoy!
 
Ye Piesang posted a link with an app that show the motion sensor.
 
that second app the guy is using in the video sounds like a lightsaber from starwars..

Already got the app piesang posted, but does anyone know what the other apps are that the guy uses in the video? Looks rather cool
 
there is rotateme, inclinometer and lightsabre. i can upload them for you, but im not uploading rotateme because it is unfair for Samir, he worked so much and now we are stealing his work, why not donate him couple of bucks and get it legally?
 
Hi guys, I copied this from my blog as I wanted to know everyone's opinion. Please comment :)

After some reading and listening to Podcasts, I think it is time to say something about Nokia's greatest fair of the year.

From what I hear from the guys at various Symbian blogs, there is little information about Ovi, but even from Nokia's press releases, I can smell that it is going to change the meaning of multimedia in smartphones, something very exciting, sharing videos, music and photos on the internet, on computers and phones, it's like a social networking website with all simplicity and all tools at your hand.

As I said in my latest review (Nokia 5310), S40 are coming very close to S60. Today there is little difference between them, they got the same basic UI, but S40 still lacks of advanced multitasking (only the music player minimizes), and there is no support for many programs and platforms.

Many of us do agree that S40 has a stable OS, not buggy, the phones themselves have a good built, and it's ready to be used, while on S60 we have to install programs here are there, and even though they have everything, on S40 they are altogether.

Another great news was the Comes with Music sign on N81, etc. This is definitely good for artists, as there will be less copyright breaking. Obviously Universal won't leave artists empty handed, and Universal themselves must have profited from the deal. A good thing is DRM, although it can be broken easily, most end-users don't have the knowledge or time to do it, so people will start owning music legally. Of course this won't stop piracy at all as the rest of the people will illegally download music, but it should reduce it, even minimally.
People won't bother as much to transfer music from their computers to music players, etc, but it can make a slight disadvantage as there will be something there that won't work, the same happens with Symbian installation files, you cannot send them from phones. Most people might not care as long as they have the music.
And of course Apple will need to protect themselves, or the sales of iPods will drop drastically, but seriously, what is the use of an iPod anyway, besides the internal hard drive?

Another news is the form factor, N82 is back to candy bar, and I don't really like it. I do like exotic designs, as long as companies don't overdo it, like the N93, which is a marvellous shaped phone, I don't prefer candy bars, but don't have anything against it.

Before I finish, I would like to comment on internal hard drives or memory cards. I think we definitely need a good solid hard drive which is fast and has a few GB of storage, but we also need a removable memory card, we could have one memory card with music, the other for video capture, etc, I think removable memory is always helpful.

Finally, what future S60s should have...From the All About Symbian podcast, I heard some bloggers suggesting better resolution, better build quality, dedicated camera buttons for macros, etc, and Darla Mack even implied that new phones shouldn't be downgraded to a 2 megapixel camera, which I totally agree. But what I think is really important on phones is battery, if we don't have those fuel cell batteries soon, I think our phones won't last long with all the functionality, even though we come from black and white call and sms phones to 5 megapixel 8GB GPS phones, this is not real battery life.
 
5 Megapixel cameraphone comparison

I couldn't help but post the great comparison that the guys from phonearena.com did from 6 different 5 megapixel camera phones.

They tried every single situation and mode possible to reach the final results.

They involved the Nokia N95 8GB, Nokia N82, Sony Ericsson K850i, LG Viewty, Samsung G800 and Samsung G600.

In each of the categories we gave all six phones a different rating. The first place brings 6 points, 5 points for the second place, 4 points for third etc.

1. N82: With very good performance during the day, the best in night scenes, and excellent flash performance, the N82 is the winner in our competition for 5-megapixel cameraphones. Additionally it also has a very good macro mode!

2. G600: Although it has smaller model number than the G800, the G600 is the best phone for shooting during the day and has a good overall image quality.

3. K850: While we are not really fans of the Sony Ericsson phone, its overall quality is good, compared to the competition.

4. N95 8GB: The N95 is good during the day, but it’s ridiculous that it turns the focus off in night mode, and the LED flash performs poorly.

5. G800: The G800 is very good during the day as well, also with optical zoom, but its overall performance doesn’t place it in the winners’ circle.

6. Viewty: Although the LG Viewty has lots of options and features, its camera quality is mediocre next to the competition.

Full article
 
The Nokia 7900 Crystal Prism adds a touch of glamour

Having an Open Source Operating System for mobiles might seem a challenge for Symbian...or maybe not.

You could compare it to Windows and Linux (and its distributions). Windows isn't Open Source but got a hefty advantage over Linux, Linux is mainly used in hosting servers and research centres, and not that much in homes. We could blame this on the distributors not having done enough publicity and not making Linux easy enough. This will not be the case of Google Android, which is basically another Linux distribution. They have won the hearts of more than 40 companies such as HTC, and also many developers thanks to their 10 million Dollars prize contest.

For developers it might seem a dream come true, but I don't think it's that good. What many people are expecting is an Operating System that can be moulded easily but these people are forgetting what Open Source really means. It means to have a public source code. This doesn't mean we can grab Google Android, remove unwanted code and personalize it. Unless Google actually comes out with a “NSU” type of program with self-uploadable firmwares, and also a SDK that allows full customization, this won't be possible.

The advantage of public source codes is that you get access to every API and other code, from which you can then design any program to replace something that the OS itself already does, and that also if there isn't any limitation, in case of virus protection, etc.

Better than nothing? I don't think so. If Google doesn't release a fully editable Operating System, the Android is as good as Symbian.

If you consider Nokia and S60, they are very software orientated. For example: On the Nokia N95, the accelerometer API wasn't released, but when programmers requested it, it was made public. If you are having access to APIs and internal code from Symbian, what is the big advantage on Google Android? Of course Nokia doesn't give away 10 million Dollars to programmers, but they are coming up with ideas, prizes, contests and good support from the extremely helpful Forum Nokia.

To some programmers it might not make a difference to have a little bit more code to play around with. But with some hardcore developers might enjoy full interactivity. In the end, the end-user is the one who counts, because most cellphone buyers aren't programmers, and for these, they might just stick with the brand they like, and here hardware will be the most important, having a 400MHz powered HTC or a 5 megapixel N95? Will Symbian react to Google? Will developers switch to Linux platform?

You might call me biased to one side, and I am a Nokia fan, I won't lie, but I really can't see much coming from Google. I do want to see improvements in future mobile phones and I am excited to try out new things.

Please do discuss your views or points with me.

Full article
 
I thought the G800 would be tops, with its optical zoom & all.
Go nokia :P
 
Interesting read - some of them seem pretty good until you compare them to the SD630.
 
Symbian against Open Source (Google Android)

Having an Open Source Operating System for mobiles might seem a challenge for Symbian...or maybe not.

You could compare it to Windows and Linux (and its distributions). Windows isn't Open Source but got a hefty advantage over Linux, Linux is mainly used in hosting servers and research centres, and not that much in homes. We could blame this on the distributors not having done enough publicity and not making Linux easy enough. This will not be the case of Google Android, which is basically another Linux distribution. They have won the hearts of more than 40 companies such as HTC, and also many developers thanks to their 10 million Dollars prize contest.

For developers it might seem a dream come true, but I don't think it's that good. What many people are expecting is an Operating System that can be moulded easily but these people are forgetting what Open Source really means. It means to have a public source code. This doesn't mean we can grab Google Android, remove unwanted code and personalize it. Unless Google actually comes out with a “NSU” type of program with self-uploadable firmwares, and also a SDK that allows full customization, this won't be possible.

The advantage of public source codes is that you get access to every API and other code, from which you can then design any program to replace something that the OS itself already does, and that also if there isn't any limitation, in case of virus protection, etc.

Better than nothing? I don't think so. If Google doesn't release a fully editable Operating System, the Android is as good as Symbian.

If you consider Nokia and S60, they are very software orientated. For example: On the Nokia N95, the accelerometer API wasn't released, but when programmers requested it, it was made public. If you are having access to APIs and internal code from Symbian, what is the big advantage on Google Android? Of course Nokia doesn't give away 10 million Dollars to programmers, but they are coming up with ideas, prizes, contests and good support from the extremely helpful Forum Nokia.


To some programmers it might not make a difference to have a little bit more code to play around with. But with some hardcore developers might enjoy full interactivity. In the end, the end-user is the one who counts, because most cellphone buyers aren't programmers, and for these, they might just stick with the brand they like, and here hardware will be the most important, having a 400MHz powered HTC or a 5 megapixel N95? Will Symbian react to Google? Will developers switch to Linux platform?

You might call me biased to one side, and I am a Nokia fan, I won't lie, but I really can't see much coming from Google. I do want to see improvements in future mobile phones and I am excited to try out new things.

Please do discuss your views or points with me.

Full article
 
Thanks for this review eagle-slayor, every bit help in choosing my next phone. N82 mmmmmmmm
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X