Facebook   Twitter    e-mail newsletter    YouTube    RSS Feed    Android App    iPhone and iPad App     BlackBerry App    


Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Canon 40D + GPS

  1. #1
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,580

    Default Canon 40D + GPS

    I just discovered something really cool. The 40D is GPS aware! Check this. Although it doesn't have any GPS functionality, it can accept coordinate from an external GPS receiver via the WFT-E3 wireless grip. In the video there's a scene where they show the camera's screen showing the information of a picture they just ook. It shows the coordinates!

    I found a GPS logger that can talk to the WFT-E3, so that system is complete, but that grip isn't exactly cheap, so it only makes sense if you already have one and/or have use for it other than GPS.

  2. #2

    Default

    Not sure about getting one for just the GPS (I wonder when manufacturers will start building that in to their dslrs) but the entire unit sounds cool.
    "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien." FM Arouet
    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke
    "Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience" Unknown

  3. #3
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwana View Post
    Not sure about getting one for just the GPS (I wonder when manufacturers will start building that in to their dslrs) but the entire unit sounds cool.
    My thoughts exactly. The only thing that really attract me to the grips is the portrait orientation controls, but not enough to spend the money on it. I'm pretty happy with the 40D's battery life 800 or so shots (RAW+JPEG) on single charge with lots of browsing the pictures in-between - which seems to eat more battery than actually taking pictures. So the wireless grip makes a little more sense to me, but damn, it's expensive!

    Anyway, I'm just amused that the camera actually understands GPS. To me that leaves Canon with an opportunity. The camera has a USB port, so why not just make a GPS logger that hooks into it? Maybe make it an option in a battery grip - then I'd buy one.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koffiejunkie View Post
    My thoughts exactly. The only thing that really attract me to the grips is the portrait orientation controls, but not enough to spend the money on it. I'm pretty happy with the 40D's battery life 800 or so shots (RAW+JPEG) on single charge with lots of browsing the pictures in-between - which seems to eat more battery than actually taking pictures. So the wireless grip makes a little more sense to me, but damn, it's expensive!

    Anyway, I'm just amused that the camera actually understands GPS. To me that leaves Canon with an opportunity. The camera has a USB port, so why not just make a GPS logger that hooks into it? Maybe make it an option in a battery grip - then I'd buy one.
    I love that about my battery grip - I was working this morning shooting portraits - in portrait - and it makes a world of difference.
    "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien." FM Arouet
    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke
    "Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience" Unknown

  5. #5
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,580

    Default

    If I actually get a paying gig, I'd definitely get a regular grip if it's not the type where I can stick the camera on a tripod.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •