Dear NEOTEL. Stating the obvious doesn't really help, especially if you go and do everything CONTRARY to the obvious.
“There are very real differences between wireless and wireline networks in supporting large numbers of concurrent users."
Duh.... So why the hell then did you decide to go with a crappy wireless service, targeted at the residential market nogal which numbers in the millions? And why CDMA of all technologies? Neotel makes CDMA, which is a fairly decent technology used all over the world, seem worse than 56k dialup. Neotel also brought in really crappy, fugly, ancient CDMA equipment (from India I believe?).
per download package pricing offers the optimum way to share their one non-renewable resource, frequency spectrum, fairly amongst users
Yes, duhh, spectrum is limited, yet you've shown yourselves to be completely useless at making effective use of this
non-renewable resource, on both the CDMA and WiMax fronts. It should be taken away from you, and given to another company that actually knows how to run a telecoms business, or in fact, run ANY sort of business.
Migrating these high usage fixed users off the CDMA EV-DO network, together with a number of technical improvements in the network, and enhanced coverage, has resulted in improved performance for the majority of CDMA users, and a resumption of the growth in user numbers that Neotel experienced initially,” said Hay.
I can almost guarantee you that there were no technical improvements made, as Neotel does not have any technical skills. Yes, they managed to get rid of a fair number of
high-end users, but that's about it. And that's the only reason why the network has improved slightly.
Also, your initial growth was due to public expectation and hope, inter-twined with Neotel's fleecing of the public: promising (not even) the world, and failing to deliver a service that is useable at all. It seems your 2nd wave of growth (so claimed - very hard to believe) will be due to user stupidity. Anybody joining Neotel now only have themselves to blame.
true broadband services over fibre can easily be uncapped without placing undue strain on the access network, and hence Neotel’s new NeoBroadband Fibre is both uncapped and unshaped.
Duh... true broadband IS fibre. Stop stating the obvious.
You say now that fibre can be uncapped and unshaped. Why then do you have FUP/AUP on your fibre product that is not open to the public to read? Neotel's version of uncapped is capped at 35GB.
Ha. Reading this at 3am was fun. Neotel continue to fail, and fail terribly. It seems almost any Neotel press release can be ripped to shreds very easily... even at 3:30am, half in a dwaal....
