Facebook   Twitter    e-mail newsletter    YouTube    RSS Feed    Android App    iPhone and iPad App     BlackBerry App    


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: AMDX2 or AMD64

  1. #16
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Plettenberg Bay
    Posts
    3,281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rburley
    Only the 2800 and 3000 754 have been discontinued
    Yep, all 32-bit sempron socket A and 754 have been discontinued too, so its just 64-bit semprons and athlons from 3200+ and up that are still being made.
    insomnia FTW!

  2. #17
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    London. Hometown: Durban
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    next year the new socket amds will be coming out, untill then the 939 socket amd 64+ are going strong.

    My firend just bought a dual core processor, he has the X2 4400+, he also has a 7800GTX and his machine is running like an animal, from trying games and all the rest on it i will def reccomend it

  3. #18

    Default

    Person...

    It's normal for lower end CPUs to be discontinued as the process technology evolves and faster and more powerful processors become available, but that does not imply that the whole architechture is being discontinued (There is a difference you know)

    Eventually it will be phased out but so what... Those processors still offer good value for money.

    That said I deffinately agree that buying the latest technology is always a good idea, if you don't mind the teething problems and premiums that go with it.
    .:: Carpe Manana ::.

  4. #19

    Default

    Standard 32bit AMD chips are being discontinued. Rectron and DOT Information Technology along with other supplyers are no longer stocking.

    AMD® Sempron 2600+ 333FSB Socket 754
    AMD® Sempron 2800+ 333FSB Socket 754

    AMD® Athlon™ 64 2800+ Socket 754
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3000+ Socket 754
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3200+ Socket 754

    AMD® Athlon™ 64 2800+ Socket 939
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3000+ Socker 939
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3200+ Socket 939

    Many of these chips have already been discontinued and no longer feature on the AMD Pricelist.

  5. #20

    Default

    bang for buck amd cpu would be the x2-3800 right now. cheaper than the 4000+

    amd64 bit is not being discontinued, but thanks for the laugh. Sure, lower speed grade cpus get phased out, thats life. Skt 754 is dead.

  6. #21

    Default

    It's like talking to a wall.. Doesn't hear a word you say.
    .:: Carpe Manana ::.

  7. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quik
    It's like talking to a wall.. Doesn't hear a word you say.
    yeah man i know how you feel, some of them just dont get it

  8. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Person
    Standard 32bit AMD chips are being discontinued. Rectron and DOT Information Technology along with other supplyers are no longer stocking.

    AMD® Sempron 2600+ 333FSB Socket 754
    AMD® Sempron 2800+ 333FSB Socket 754

    AMD® Athlon™ 64 2800+ Socket 754
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3000+ Socket 754
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3200+ Socket 754

    AMD® Athlon™ 64 2800+ Socket 939
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3000+ Socker 939
    AMD® Athlon™ 64 3200+ Socket 939

    Many of these chips have already been discontinued and no longer feature on the AMD Pricelist.
    Why do you think they are called Athlon 64??????

    The new Semprons are even 64bit.

    Tell me this, if Mercedes take away the C180 does that mean the ENTIRE C CLASS IS GONE? NO it only means the entry level gets taken away to make room for another model at the top. Well that is what is happening to the AMD lineup.

    And Guess what the AMD Athlon X2 does not exist,it is called "
    AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor".

    Now before taking your foot and placing it firmly in your mouth again go read up on what an Athlon 64 is and what it can do. BTW the X2 series simply contain 2 Athlon 64's on one die. THe 4800+ contains 2 4000+ cores.

  9. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by werner
    bang for buck amd cpu would be the x2-3800 right now. cheaper than the 4000+

    Well kinda depends on what you plan on doing with the CPU. If you are going to be doing moslty things that are single threaded then the X2 3800+ is a huge waste. The 3800+ runs 2 x 2.0Ghz 512K cache per core. This means it consists out of 2 Athlon 64 3000+ cores. Games for example you only use 1 core so no speed increase.

    Click Go down to the UT2004 scores. Look at the 4000+ vs 4800+ vs 3800+. As you will see the 4000+ and 4800+ are about the same but the 3800+ is much slower. Remember the 4800+ = 2x4000+.

    Click Now lets look at WinRAR. Pretty much the same as with UT2004. But then comes a big multi threaded app, 3ds max 7. It fully uses all the CPU's/Cores that it can. Now here the 4800+ is double as fast as the 4000+ and the 3800+ really does impress.

    Click Next we have some video encoding that uses dual core. As you can see the 3800+ beats the 4000+ again.

    If you plan on doing things like 3d rendering or video encoding then the 3800+ is great. If not then you simply sit with an overpriced 3000+.

    R1098.00 for the 3000+
    R2695.00 for the 3800+

    They give the same performance for single threaded apps.

    I actually want to build a cheap rendering PC using a 3800+. I currently run a 4000+ and using a 3800+ as a main PC wont do, I play games so 3000+ speeds are slow compared to the 4000+ I have now.

    I would say wait for the Dual cores to drop in price and for Vista, which afaik will use full mutli threading, to be released.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •