Global Depopulation

[LoneGunman]

The powers that be have long been following various global depopulation agenda's - the general thinking being not that there should be an improvement in all lives, but that the world population itself, needs to be culled down in order to maintain life for the 'elite' populations.

Despite the fact that Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.a...20021206b.html

Here's a page dedicated to Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for
Food Control Genocide:
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/foo...m_jb_1995.html

Here's a report: The plan to poison S-E Asia
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...?oneclick=true
"World-famous microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet, the Nobel prize winner revered as Australia's greatest medical research scientist, secretly urged the government to develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and other "overpopulated" countries of South-East Asia.
The revelation is contained in top-secret files declassified by the National Archives of Australia, despite resistance from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Sir Macfarlane recommended in a secret report in 1947 that biological and chemical weapons should be developed to target food crops and spread infectious diseases."

Here's a 1991 quote from oceanographer Jacques Cousteau:
"The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics — it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes. The damage is directly linked to consumption. Our society is turning toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to cancer....This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it."

Against this backdrop of thinking, its not surprising that we read
U.S. to create a bird flu virus mutation
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...0452-8400r.htm
"Atlanta, GA, Mar. 24 (UPI) -- The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has begun a series of experiments to see how likely the bird flu virus could result in a human pandemic.. The six-month series of experiments seeks to simulate the mixing and matching of genes from the H5N1 avian flu virus that has plagued Asia and a common human flu virus that public-health experts fear could turn avian flu into a pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

CDC scientists inside an ultra-secure laboratory have started swapping the genes of the H5N1 avian virus with the genes of an H3N2 virus, the strain behind most recent human flu outbreaks."

It's also not surprising that this current SA government seems to be not minding that 600 people a day are dying from AID's. (If they 'cared' we'd see emergency measures and major clampdowns and enforced testing) speeches of 'concern' while 600 deaths a day continue, indicate its exactly what they want in reality. A useful removal of 'excess people' - who'll never be needed to be employed, schooled, housed, fed. Good for the ANC budget projections. Callous, sure - but absolutely in keeping and in line with the overall global depopulation agenda.

[Albereth]

It doesn't count just because it's the first working day in April. You have to do it on the 1st.

(Even if I agree with your last paragraph)

[kilo39]

It's also not surprising that this current SA government seems to be not minding that 600 people a day are dying from AID's. (If they 'cared' we'd see emergency measures and major clampdowns and enforced testing) speeches of 'concern' while 600 deaths a day continue, indicate its exactly what they want in reality. A useful removal of 'excess people' - who'll never be needed to be employed, schooled, housed, fed. Good for the ANC budget projections. Callous, sure - but absolutely in keeping and in line with the overall global depopulation agenda.

And still they vote for them.

[Moederloos]

It's also not surprising that this current SA government seems to be not minding that 600 people a day are dying from AID's. (If they 'cared' we'd see emergency measures and major clampdowns and enforced testing) speeches of 'concern' while 600 deaths a day continue, indicate its exactly what they want in reality. A useful removal of 'excess people' - who'll never be needed to be employed, schooled, housed, fed. Good for the ANC budget projections. Callous, sure - but absolutely in keeping and in line with the overall global depopulation agenda.

While I do not agree or disagree with this statement (since there is no factual basis on which to form an opinion), why should evolution not favour the strongest - and if evolution is now controlled through intelligence and human selection, as opposed to natural selection, all the better.

[tibby.dude]

A University of Texas biology professor has been targeted by talk radio, bloggers and vitriolic e-mails — including a death threat — after a published report that he advocated death for most of the population as a means of saving the Earth.

But Eric Pianka said Monday his remarks about what he believes is an impending pandemic were taken out of context.

"What we really need to do is start thinking about controlling our population before it's too late," he said. "It's already too late, but we're not even thinking about it. We're just mindlessly rushing ahead breeding our brains out."

The public furor began when The Gazette-Enterprise of Seguin, Texas, reported Sunday on two speeches Pianka made last month to groups of scientists and students about vanishing animal habitats and the explosion of the human population.

The newspaper's Jamie Mobley attended one of those speeches and also interviewed Forrest Mims, an amateur scientist and author who heard Pianka speak early last month before the Texas Academy of Science.

After the newspaper's report appeared, it was circulated widely and posted on "The Drudge Report." It quickly became talk radio fodder.

The Gazette-Enterprise quoted Pianka as saying disease "will control the scourge of humanity. We're looking forward to a huge collapse."

The professor weighed the killing power of various diseases such as bird flu and HIV, insisting neither would yield the needed results.

"HIV is too slow. Its no good," he said. He went on to discuss how an ebola pandemic could wipe out a significant chunk of the human population.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...n/3769650.html

[tibby.dude]

I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to an area, and you multiply, and multiply, until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet, you are a plague, and we are the cure.

Agent Smith - "The Matrix"

[kilo39]

The Crime is Life - The sentence is Death!

(thanks to Judge Dredd comix!!)

[hj2k_x]

While I do not agree or disagree with this statement (since there is no factual basis on which to form an opinion), why should evolution not favour the strongest - and if evolution is now controlled through intelligence and human selection, as opposed to natural selection, all the better.

sounds harsh, but i'd agree with that as well

[sakura]

The problem with evolution is that the theory itself seems to favour the very people who punt it, for example the bigshots on this forum. They really think they are so important to mankind but in reality not one of them has ever proved willing to even do what the so called "weaker people" have done!

[hj2k_x]

The problem with evolution is that the theory itself seems to favour the very people who punt it, for example the bigshots on this forum. They really think they are so important to mankind but in reality not one of them has ever proved willing to even do what the so called "weaker people" have done!

like what??

[sakura]

technological discoveries, new products, new inventions

[IanC]

technological discoveries, new products, new inventions

Are you calling the likes of Archimedes, Edison, Bell, Einstein, Whittle, etc ... weaker people??

[sakura]

not them, I am referring specifically to south africa and a few l33t people on this forum

[ajak]

The powers that be have long been following various global depopulation agenda's - the general thinking being not that there should be an improvement in all lives, but that the world population itself, needs to be culled down in order to maintain life for the 'elite' populations.

Despite the fact that Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.a...20021206b.html

Here's a page dedicated to Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for
Food Control Genocide:
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/foo...m_jb_1995.html

Here's a report: The plan to poison S-E Asia
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...?oneclick=true
"World-famous microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet, the Nobel prize winner revered as Australia's greatest medical research scientist, secretly urged the government to develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and other "overpopulated" countries of South-East Asia.
The revelation is contained in top-secret files declassified by the National Archives of Australia, despite resistance from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Sir Macfarlane recommended in a secret report in 1947 that biological and chemical weapons should be developed to target food crops and spread infectious diseases."

Here's a 1991 quote from oceanographer Jacques Cousteau:
"The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics — it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes. The damage is directly linked to consumption. Our society is turning toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to cancer....This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it."

Against this backdrop of thinking, its not surprising that we read
U.S. to create a bird flu virus mutation
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...0452-8400r.htm
"Atlanta, GA, Mar. 24 (UPI) -- The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has begun a series of experiments to see how likely the bird flu virus could result in a human pandemic.. The six-month series of experiments seeks to simulate the mixing and matching of genes from the H5N1 avian flu virus that has plagued Asia and a common human flu virus that public-health experts fear could turn avian flu into a pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

CDC scientists inside an ultra-secure laboratory have started swapping the genes of the H5N1 avian virus with the genes of an H3N2 virus, the strain behind most recent human flu outbreaks."

It's also not surprising that this current SA government seems to be not minding that 600 people a day are dying from AID's. (If they 'cared' we'd see emergency measures and major clampdowns and enforced testing) speeches of 'concern' while 600 deaths a day continue, indicate its exactly what they want in reality. A useful removal of 'excess people' - who'll never be needed to be employed, schooled, housed, fed. Good for the ANC budget projections. Callous, sure - but absolutely in keeping and in line with the overall global depopulation agenda.

The gvt said that it has put aside 9billion rand to “combat aids”, tell me what ever happened to the millions that the usa/eu/gates and such gave for this purpose?

[IanC]

not them, I am referring specifically to south africa and a few l33t people on this forum

OK, you'll really need to expand on this a little:

You say the theory of evolution "seems to favour the very people who punt it" specifically "the bigshots on this forum", how does the theory of evolution favour "the bigshots on this forum"?

You then go on to state that "not one of them has ever proved willing to even do what the so called "weaker people" have done", and you expand slightly on this by saying that done means "technological discoveries, new products, new inventions". Who are these weaker people who have made discoveries and invented new products?