It isn't doing any harm, and it is nice to be able to encourage someone or support their argument without having to do it publicly or without derailing a thread so I say keep it.
Yes
No
It isn't doing any harm, and it is nice to be able to encourage someone or support their argument without having to do it publicly or without derailing a thread so I say keep it.
Last edited by ave; 17-03-2012 at 11:43 PM.
The reputation system in its current form is really pointless. If there was a way of implementing per-post rep as suggested a few posts back, it would add a lot more value to the forum. If that's not possible, I'd say no.
No. Dump it!
Aquila Muscas Non Capit
馬鹿は死ななきゃ治らない。
Voted No.
It'd be more beneficial to have an individual post rating.
No please get rid of it as it is pointless and it will be abused
i voted no, its interesting that the guys with the highest rep are the guys who are mostly on TK or off topic...
No, pointless in current form.
I want the slashdot system.
Last edited by biometrics; 18-03-2012 at 03:43 PM.
Terrible system and completely pointless and full of fail, so no.
Cowboy's never cry
As a wise man once said, men are from Mars and women like penis.
Cliques, so... no. Ability to rate posts instead of posters or nothing as far as I'm concerned.Originally Posted by Rosaudio
I vote No.
It's completely pointless with the way it is implemented at the moment.
Even worse!
Cowboy's never cry
As a wise man once said, men are from Mars and women like penis.
+1
This will be the most constructive as far as I can tell.
I like it, but my problem is that you have to "spread reputation around" before giving it to the same person again. I find this absurd because I rep if I have been helped etc, and if the same guy helps me twice I have to rep like 20 people who did not help me, to rep him.
Voted no. It's very clear that it's being abused
Running Windows? ... Upgrade to Linux
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks