ZCFOutkast
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2014
- Messages
- 1,950
I wasn't talking about a selection of the best players over a specific period. I was talking about a Test XI I could select and it would be able to beat selections of one of the Tests teams (e.g AUS the only other side capable of assembling a competitive side minus those in the World XI).I put more stock in the ICC's opinion of AB than yours.
Even you in your right mind would know Williamson, Root, Broad, Herath, Southee would not make it into the best Test XI side now, yet Root&Williamson have been as prolific as AB in run scoring Tests wise but I left them out of my side too.
Comments below you have shown Amla is basically the first pick in Tests&ODIs ahead of everyone else as you can trust him to bat anywhere in the top 4 successfully. In my opinion (and most if you follow most cricket forums through the world) this ICC selection is a joke practically, but over a period it fits the bill.
Australia can easily beat this ICC Test team - (Rogers, Watson, Shaun Marsh, Smith, Clarke(c), Mitchell Marsh, Haddin(wk), Harris, Starc, Lyon, Hazlewood). Even an alternative Test XI selection stands a good chance of beating it - (Amla, Younis/Shehzad/Ballance, Kohli/KP, Smith, Clarke(c), Watson, BMac(wk), Philander, Harris, Ajmal, Anderson/Roach) beacuse it's more balanced. I don't think any Test selection can beat my XI because those are the best right now (minus Chanders, Clarke&AB whose batting can be matched but they bring nothing else, and none are anywhere near as good as Sanga).
That ICC side has 5 tailenders(4 seamers&a spinner), an unnatural opener who's young&still developing, AB who has no significant experience coming in at #4, Joe Root who like Williamson is young&still developing. Johnson batting at #7!!! Of the top 7, the only players fit for their roles are Warner, Sanga&Mathews.
Mathews is a brilliant captain make no mistak, fantastic, but he can't hold candle to Clarke.
That team would lose to AUS and an alternative selection but you're welcome to stand by the ICC.
I won't even bother with that ICC ODI side because NZ, AUS, SA, ENG, IND, SL and maybe even PAK would thump that ICC ODI side 10 matches out of 10, never mind 3 alternative ODI selections one cuold come up with!
At the end of the day, given a chance, I doubt if those in the selction panel - Kumble, Jonathan Angew, Russel Arnold, Stephen Fleming and Betty Timmer - would have individually selected any XI that looks close to those.
Yes AB can be accomodated but in an manner that is unnatural to him and he's entirely unproven at, something I wouldn't waste time doing considering I'm given tens of these brilliant suited players to pick an XI from. He's had a brilliant Test year in 2013, but on the whole he has been inferior to the really top batsmen for all the other years/seasons. You have to go back to 2008 to get his next best year. Not good enough when compared to the very best performers in each of the last 10 years. He doesn't even feature in this list while a lot of current players do http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/284248.html. Never mind this list http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/142011.html
Last edited: