TheRoDent

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
3,379
Thanks.

@PBCool, what do the below results mean?

iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 100M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 ME-Desktop 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:31:38 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: ME-Desktop.1550241098.435704.297268e
[ 4] local 192.168.88.200 port 51737 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.1 Mbits/sec 0.203 ms 403/8623 (4.7%) (omitted)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12943 and received packet = 12957 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12944 and received packet = 12957 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12945 and received packet = 12957 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12946 and received packet = 12962 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12947 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12948 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12949 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12950 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12951 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12952 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12953 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12954 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12955 and received packet = 12965 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16378 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16379 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16380 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16381 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16382 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16383 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16384 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16385 and received packet = 16404 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.0 Mbits/sec 0.183 ms 446/8643 (5.2%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 87.8 Mbits/sec 0.194 ms 1086/8930 (12%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.3 Mbits/sec 0.208 ms 782/8928 (8.8%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 91.9 Mbits/sec 0.196 ms 724/8929 (8.1%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.9 Mbits/sec 0.203 ms 632/8927 (7.1%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.0 Mbits/sec 0.193 ms 714/8930 (8%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.8 Mbits/sec 0.217 ms 641/8925 (7.2%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.8 Mbits/sec 0.191 ms 738/8931 (8.3%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.4 Mbits/sec 0.177 ms 679/8929 (7.6%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 11.0 MBytes 92.4 Mbits/sec 0.211 ms 681/8929 (7.6%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.5 Mbits/sec 0.216 ms 754/8925 (8.4%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 119 MBytes 100 Mbits/sec 0.187 ms 7475/90030 (8.3%)
[ 4] Sent 90030 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 15.9% (6.3%u/9.6%s), remote/sender 1.5% (0.2%u/1.3%s)

iperf Done.
It means you have quite a bit of packet loss on your line at 100mbps. If your actual line speeds is 100mbps, please re-run the test at a bit lower than your 100mbps rate, e.g. 80mbps.

Example:
iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
 

Johnatan56

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
23,424
It means you have quite a bit of packet loss on your line at 100mbps. If your actual line speeds is 100mbps, please re-run the test at a bit lower than your 100mbps rate, e.g. 80mbps.

Example:
iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
$ iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 90M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Lenovo-PC 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:37:42 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: Lenovo-PC.1550313461.979592.44334adb
[ 4] local 192.168.0.110 port 51220 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.6 MBytes 89.0 Mbits/sec 0.194 ms 156/8099 (1.9%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.7 Mbits/sec 0.156 ms 0/8280 (0%) (omitted)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20373 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20374 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20375 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20376 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20377 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20378 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20379 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 20380 and received packet = 20396 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.165 ms 8/8038 (0.1%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32346 and received packet = 32361 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32347 and received packet = 32362 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32348 and received packet = 32364 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32349 and received packet = 32366 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32350 and received packet = 32366 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32351 and received packet = 32367 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32352 and received packet = 32369 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32353 and received packet = 32369 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 32354 and received packet = 32369 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.153 ms 9/8034 (0.11%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.178 ms 1/8037 (0.012%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.170 ms 0/8036 (0%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.164 ms 0/8035 (0%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.168 ms 0/8037 (0%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.173 ms 2/8034 (0.025%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 90.0 Mbits/sec 0.141 ms 0/8035 (0%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.6 Mbits/sec 0.151 ms 0/7645 (0%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 10.1 MBytes 85.0 Mbits/sec 0.182 ms 432/8022 (5.4%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 108 MBytes 90.4 Mbits/sec 0.188 ms 452/80372 (0.56%)
[ 4] Sent 80372 datagrams
[SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 17 datagrams received out-of-order
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 18.1% (5.3%u/12.8%s), remote/sender 2.3% (0.0%u/2.3%s)

iperf Done.
---------------------------------------
$ iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 Lenovo-PC 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 10:39:07 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: Lenovo-PC.1550313547.674607.12a1fdf0
[ 4] local 192.168.0.110 port 56027 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.74 MBytes 81.7 Mbits/sec 0.093 ms 120/7417 (1.6%) (omitted)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.080 ms 0/7143 (0%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.098 ms 0/7145 (0%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.097 ms 0/7142 (0%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.137 ms 0/7142 (0%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.104 ms 1/7144 (0.014%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.53 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.105 ms 1/7142 (0.014%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.53 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.110 ms 1/7142 (0.014%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.095 ms 0/7142 (0%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.084 ms 0/7147 (0%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.53 MBytes 79.9 Mbits/sec 0.095 ms 0/7138 (0%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.36 MBytes 78.5 Mbits/sec 0.114 ms 136/7144 (1.9%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.8 MBytes 80.3 Mbits/sec 0.074 ms 139/71448 (0.19%)
[ 4] Sent 71448 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 22.5% (7.6%u/14.9%s), remote/sender 0.6% (0.0%u/0.6%s)

iperf Done.
I'm also on Frogfoot 100Mbps.
 

John Tempus

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2017
Messages
1,393
@TheRoDent did something just go super wonky in Cape Town ? No loss but 141ms between 154.0.1.13 and 154.0.4.158

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 155.93.248.1 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 154.0.1.125 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 154.0.1.13 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 154.0.4.158 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 140 | 140 | 141 | 141 |
| 154.0.5.18 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 140 | 140 | 143 | 140 |
| 195.66.225.179 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 141 | 141 | 145 | 141 |
| 1.1.1.1 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
 

AfricanTech

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 19, 2010
Messages
34,017
It means you have quite a bit of packet loss on your line at 100mbps. If your actual line speeds is 100mbps, please re-run the test at a bit lower than your 100mbps rate, e.g. 80mbps.

Example:
iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u

C:\Users\ME\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3 --verbose --port 17001 -c trcvmh01.cisp.co.za --bandwidth 80M -l 1400 --omit 2 -R -u
iperf 3.1.3
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 ME-Desktop 2.5.1(0.297/5/3) 2016-04-21 22:14 x86_64
Time: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 08:25:48 GMT
Connecting to host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host trcvmh01.cisp.co.za is sending
Cookie: ME-Desktop.1550391947.834265.1a20e09
[ 4] local 192.168.88.200 port 58821 connected to 154.0.15.181 port 17001
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 1400 byte blocks, omitting 2 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.69 MBytes 81.3 Mbits/sec 0.174 ms 0/7259 (0%) (omitted)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 10538 and received packet = 10564 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 10539 and received packet = 10566 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 10540 and received packet = 10566 AND SP = 4
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.34 MBytes 78.3 Mbits/sec 0.226 ms 152/7143 (2.1%) (omitted)
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.36 MBytes 78.5 Mbits/sec 0.213 ms 136/7144 (1.9%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.37 MBytes 78.6 Mbits/sec 0.208 ms 126/7145 (1.8%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.50 MBytes 79.7 Mbits/sec 0.173 ms 27/7142 (0.38%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.192 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.189 ms 0/7142 (0%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.210 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.197 ms 0/7143 (0%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.43 MBytes 79.1 Mbits/sec 0.204 ms 82/7143 (1.1%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.42 MBytes 79.0 Mbits/sec 0.210 ms 85/7141 (1.2%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.54 MBytes 80.0 Mbits/sec 0.191 ms 0/7142 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 95.6 MBytes 80.2 Mbits/sec 0.178 ms 456/71449 (0.64%)
[ 4] Sent 71449 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 24.2% (8.3%u/15.9%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)

iperf Done.
 

Tinuva

The Magician
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
8,388
@TheRoDent did something just go super wonky in Cape Town ? No loss but 141ms between 154.0.1.13 and 154.0.4.158

|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 155.93.248.1 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 154.0.1.125 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 154.0.1.13 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 154.0.4.158 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 140 | 140 | 141 | 141 |
| 154.0.5.18 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 140 | 140 | 143 | 140 |
| 195.66.225.179 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 141 | 141 | 145 | 141 |
| 1.1.1.1 - 0 | 8 | 8 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
Looks normal. 154.0.4.158 sits in London on the CISP network.

What have happened in your traceroute, is that CloudFlare rerouted to London for a short while there. Could be for many reasons, either CISP busy with network maintenance and a blip happened in the routing, or CloudFlare is busy with maintenance and they stopped advertising their SA ranges for a short while.
 

daelm

Active Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
66
related to my CI/VT contract, does anyone have a contact at Vumatel? I have been trying to get my line checked since December, as it is intermittently slow on both wifi and cable, without reason. Vumatel insists that I have to work through the ISP, Cool Ideas, who booked a call out. Vumatel missed two appointments to come out, and then cancelled the call due to "insufficient information". I'd like to follow up.

Also, recommendations for another fibre provider are also welcome. Vumatel not working for me and the Cool Ideas relationship achieves little.

Thanks
 
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
21
@PBCool

Sitting with a problem on my MFN line certain things are working correctly but others are not.

I have logged a ticket with yoursupport but the response I got has not resolved the issue at all.

Ticket number : #COOL-201902161-220075
 

f2wohf

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
15,062
Why don't you call again? Personally would have thought it's a sales issue, and most places' sales people only work weekdays.
I wasn't home yesterday, came back at lunch today am leaving tomorrow morning so I'll leave it here.

I'll probably cancel fiber soon anyway, I'm hardly home 2 days a week and when I am I spend most of the time out.
 

vaya

Active Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
56
Its terrible my ping is currently 30+ (from 4ms) to cool ideas when doing a speedtest
Yeah, seeing that tonight too.
Code:
x@x:~$ mtr -rc 50 cisp.co.za
HOST: x                           Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- ???                       100.0    50    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
  2.|-- 154.0.5.185                0.0%    50    3.8   3.7   3.5   4.0   0.1
  3.|-- 154.0.5.190                0.0%    50   26.0  28.5  20.6  32.3   3.0
  4.|-- 154.0.5.66                 0.0%    50   30.5  29.2  20.1  33.8   3.4
    |  `|-- 154.0.5.65
  5.|-- 154.0.5.145                0.0%    50   32.5  29.7  22.1  33.8   3.1
  6.|-- 154.0.3.226                0.0%    50   30.1  30.3  20.2  34.2   3.0
  7.|-- 154.0.13.95                2.0%    50   22.3  29.9  19.5  35.0   3.4
Openserve slow for me as well tonight for the first time in a while.... anthing going on?
Yeah, on openserve too. Local seems okay but with a higher ping and international not looking great. Can't watch Twitch.

 
Top