I'm one of the older members here on MyBB. I'm here for the news, the, classifieds, the deals, the forum, and the conferences. I'm part of the community with its good and bad.
Over the past weekend I welcomed the new vetting of comments in the news section. I thought it was a great idea, especially since some of the comments added absolutely no value to the community, but rather created a culture of political division and continuous insults.
What is worrisome for me however, is the process of vetting these comments.
A few days ago I saw a comment that read
"Yes, the voting majority are morons"
This is the exact thing we need vetting for
I immediately asked how a comment like this was allowed to pass through the vetting process. My question was deleted (or not approved).
I rephrased and wrote "you can't call people morons" and again my comment was not approved.
I'm not sure who else spoke up but the original comment was deleted.
I think if the vetting process is to work then there can't be favouritism.
This feels more like censorship than vetting. It feels like MyBB wants to influence the readers by selecting comments which favour the narritive. This can't be the case if a news site is to be neutral and report solely on facts.
I expect fairness and transparency, otherwise this is just modern day censorship
Over the past weekend I welcomed the new vetting of comments in the news section. I thought it was a great idea, especially since some of the comments added absolutely no value to the community, but rather created a culture of political division and continuous insults.
What is worrisome for me however, is the process of vetting these comments.
A few days ago I saw a comment that read
"Yes, the voting majority are morons"
This is the exact thing we need vetting for
I immediately asked how a comment like this was allowed to pass through the vetting process. My question was deleted (or not approved).
I rephrased and wrote "you can't call people morons" and again my comment was not approved.
I'm not sure who else spoke up but the original comment was deleted.
I think if the vetting process is to work then there can't be favouritism.
This feels more like censorship than vetting. It feels like MyBB wants to influence the readers by selecting comments which favour the narritive. This can't be the case if a news site is to be neutral and report solely on facts.
I expect fairness and transparency, otherwise this is just modern day censorship


