Alrighty. So over the weekend I tried three new whiskies, courtesy of
@Luben above.
Lastly, the one I was looking forward to most. I kept it aside and attacked it with a bit of an already made up mind, considering I know what it costs, and what you can get for R30 more. The Ardbeg Wee Beastie. On the pour it was clear it's a young whisky - the colour is light, and the whisky doesn't present the longest legs I've come to associate with Ardbegs. I was all set to have all my predictions proven right - this is a young Ardbeg for the same money, a RIPOFF.
But then not. The nose was a lot of the same Ardbeg, but the smoke was hotter and the sweet notes a bit subdued. Yes, that points to a young Ardbeg 10, but I found myself enjoying it more than I thought I would.
Then the taste. This was where it hit me - this isn't just Ardbeg 10 at half the age. Yes, you can taste the young age in there. It's a bit green, with a hint of hay in the mix, but it's not like it tries to act older. As an aged statement, it means that's what Ardbeg wanted to show. And it works. Man, it works!
There's smoke. Quite a lot of it, actually. Hot smoke, reminding me more of a forest fire than the Ardbeg 10. There's also less of the earthy notes than I get in Ardbeg 10. It's more focused on smoke, less fruity, less sweet, but somehow it still balances, even though the balance is way out. It finishes with more of a fire smoke, reminding me of smoking meats with Mesquite wood chips, than the 10YO. The finish is a bit shorter than I get on the 10YO, but I'm not sure if that's because of the age or because the smoke just takes over and "lingers" a bit shorter. I honestly don't know.
The reviews I've read on this have said that it's mostly a young Ardbeg. Yes, it is. It's a 5YO Ardbeg. But that's not bad. I like that this does not try to be a 10YO in half the time. Instead it does it's own thing, and doesn't trod on the 10YO's playing field. It's not bad. At all. If you pour me this as a darm I'd take it gladly.
But then the question popped into my mind. Will I buy it? I had to think about it for a while, and then I realized the answer is the same - no. I won't. Not at that price. For me, there are cheaper malts that cover the intro to malts, like the Laphroaig Select (which I also happened to taste a week ago), that covers peat better than the Wee Beastie. It's still too aggressive for an intro to peat, but it's not developed enough (for me) to be a sustained drink. It's not bad, at all, but it comes down to this for me - for R30 more I can buy a 10YO. The 10YO is smoother, more balanced, rounder and way more complex on the palate. I like the Wee Beastie, but I don't see where Ardbeg tried to hit the market with it. I just don't.
