koffiejunkie
26-11-2008, 02:28 AM
I noticed dpreview have their review of the G10
The noise performance looks to be slightly better than the G9 (though only slightly), despite the increase in resolution. The detail retained at higher ISOs is better on the G10 compared to the G9, while the noise is a finer grain and less obtrusive. From ISO 200 onwards, the G10 is noticeably producing better fine detail while keeping the noise levels lower than the G9 - quite an achievement given the increase in sensor resolution. ("]out[/url]. Noticed this bit:
[url="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong10/page8.asp)
....G10@ISO1600..... .....G9@ISO1600....
http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG10/Samples/ISO_Noise/G10_ISO1600_0512_crop.jpg (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong10/page8.asp) http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG10/Samples/ISO_Noise/G9/G9_ISO1600_crop.jpg (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong10/page8.asp)
The noise performance looks to be slightly better than the G9 (though only slightly), despite the increase in resolution. The detail retained at higher ISOs is better on the G10 compared to the G9, while the noise is a finer grain and less obtrusive. From ISO 200 onwards, the G10 is noticeably producing better fine detail while keeping the noise levels lower than the G9 - quite an achievement given the increase in sensor resolution. ("]out[/url]. Noticed this bit:
[url="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong10/page8.asp)
....G10@ISO1600..... .....G9@ISO1600....
http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG10/Samples/ISO_Noise/G10_ISO1600_0512_crop.jpg (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong10/page8.asp) http://a.img-dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG10/Samples/ISO_Noise/G9/G9_ISO1600_crop.jpg (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong10/page8.asp)