NATO readies for military operation in Syria – envoy

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Reaction score
17
Location
South Africa.
The North-Atlantic alliance is already planning a military operation in Syria, Russia’s envoy to the organization, Dmitry Rogozin has stated, adding that Moscow is going to oppose the move.

In an interview with Izvestia newspaper, Rogizin noted that a military campaign “could become a logical conclusion to the military and media operations which were carried out by the West in relation to North Africa”. That, according to the diplomat, referred specifically to those countries whose governing principles were different from those of the West.

“For instance, in Qatar, such an eventuality (a military operation) has not been considered; it’s a country that hosts American bases. A military intervention in Syria has never been ruled out,” he said.

Moscow, anticipating the possibility that a new UN Security Council resolution will be improperly interpreted – as happened with the one on Libya – will object to any military solutions in Syria, Rogozin pointed out.

On Wednesday, following three days of debates which failed to result in a formal resolution, the Security Council issued a non-binding statement. For the first time since the beginning of the unrest, it has officially condemned “the widespread violation of human rights in Syria and the use of force against civilians by the country’s security forces,” while also urging the Damascus authorities to respect human rights and observe international law.

“Those responsible for the violence should be held accountable,” the Council said in a presidential statement, the UN official website reports.

The 15-member body also stressed that “the only solution to the current crisis in Syria is through an inclusive and Syrian-led political process, with the aim of effectively addressing the legitimate aspirations of and concerns of the population which will allow for the full exercise of fundamental freedoms for its entire population, including those of expression and assembly.”

Meanwhile, dozens are believed to have been killed in the government’s violent crackdown on the protesters in the Arab republic. This week has become the bloodiest in the five-month long anti-government uprising against President Bashar Assad's regime.

According to US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, to date the Syrian government “is responsible for the deaths of more than 2,000 people of all ages." Speaking Thursday at a media conference, she repeated the administration’s stance, saying that “President Asad has lost his legitimacy to govern the Syrian people”. Clinton added that the US will “continue to support the Syrians themselves in their efforts to begin a peaceful and orderly transition to democracy”.

Moscow has been calling for a dialogue between the Syrian leadership and the opposition as they advocated reforms in the country.

http://rt.com/politics/syria-nato-rogozin-operation/

This could get very interesting soon.
 
Syria is a close ally so naturally the Kremlin mafia will come to their defence


According to US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, to date the Syrian government “is responsible for the deaths of more than 2,000 people of all ages." Speaking Thursday at a media conference, she repeated the administration’s stance, saying that “President Asad has lost his legitimacy to govern the Syrian people”. Clinton added that the US will “continue to support the Syrians themselves in their efforts to begin a peaceful and orderly transition to democracy”.

A slight change of tune...

A few months ago Hilary was calling Assad a "reformer", John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi met the guy regularly and the Obama administration even sent an ambassador after Bush had cut off relations with Syria over the assassination of the Lebanese prime minister.
 
No i doubt it is a case of russia protecting them, russia is just annoyed about that resolution set out for libya was abused.

US don't know who is friend and who foe sometimes.
 
Last edited:
Some sort of intervention is obviously needed, but the US and NATO's track record is getting seriously tarnished by now.
Can't we send Malema there? Plz?
 
Some sort of intervention is obviously needed, but the US and NATO's track record is getting seriously tarnished by now.
Can't we send Malema there? Plz?

Well the U.N will do nothing.


As I've pointed out the only major western country not heavily involved in combat operations against tyrants is Germany. Other than that you have Russia and China who are more likely to side with Assad in killing protesters :o
 
Some sort of intervention is obviously needed, but the US and NATO's track record is getting seriously tarnished by now.
Can't we send Malema there? Plz?

yes with pleasure, we tie him to the first bombs dropped :D. Sounds like a wonderful idea to me.

Rubbish alan, russia and china never sided with libya so how do you make that remark? China and russia will side with syria purely based on the F up that is Libya. No i would not say side with syria, lets say they won't go with with the flow based on what is happening in libya.
 
Last edited:
Russia is upset that the dictators it openly supports are being brought down. They have those corrupt rulers under their wings, buying their weapons, selling them their resources... now theyre throwing a hissy fit because all the money they spent corrupting those rulers might go to waste.
 
As I've pointed out the only major western country not heavily involved in combat operations against tyrants is Germany. Other than that you have Russia and China who are more likely to side with Assad in killing protesters :o

The West only acts against the puppet tyrants who fall out of favour.
 
Where's the Arab league? Any mass protests against Syria in the Arab world?

Contrast the reaction to that if Israel went postal on Gaza like this?
 
Where's the Arab league? Any mass protests against Syria in the Arab world?

Contrast the reaction to that if Israel went postal on Gaza like this?

Nope arabs in general let each country sort itself out, they tend not to go and bomb countries to shyte while claiming to be helping

So you think israel would murder civilians alan? I doubt the US would even say anything if they did.
 
According to US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, to date the Syrian government “is responsible for the deaths of more than 2,000 people of all ages." Speaking Thursday at a media conference, she repeated the administration’s stance, saying that “President Asad has lost his legitimacy to govern the Syrian people”. Clinton added that the US will “continue to support the Syrians themselves in their efforts to begin a peaceful and orderly transition to democracy”.
Bull****. Hey Hillary, there are these other places called Zimbabwe, Somalia and Ivory Cost. Why aren't you "continuing to support them in their efforts to begin a peaceful and orderly transition to democracy”?
 
I'm guessing you support the Libyan dictator as well ?

If so do you mind giving reasons why he should get away with killing thousands of civilians ?

OR are you only supporting him because he is anti-West ?

I support the Libya people. With that said, Gadaffi and the majority of his people were happy until the EU/US realized Gadaffi was doing something they don't like. The anti-Gadaffi people[maybe not all] who died were trying to bring his regime correct? So to him, they are now pretty much traitors/enemies. Perhaps in Libya, if you protest against the Government, you will die.

With that said, I believe NATO has killed many more innocent civilians and they are continuing to do so as we speak. People forget we are just humans, the West wants to sustain control of the world, someone has to be oppressed/lose and right now, it's clearly us.

Quite obviously nothing. I made that clear in the post. But let me rephrase that for you:

Hi VioAdmin - please address questions posed to you in the nationalisation thread - http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthre...lise-the-Mines before Syria is bombed by Nato...

Hi DJ - If I recall in your previous posts YOU started trying to insult me for no reason, and then you ask me to address YOUR questions?

lol, i'll pass like Tom Brady.
 
Bull****. Hey Hillary, there are these other places called Zimbabwe, Somalia and Ivory Cost. Why aren't you "continuing to support them in their efforts to begin a peaceful and orderly transition to democracy”?

Yea i wonder why somalia who have their people starving to do death get passed over for liyba, a country that the west has been fine with many decades. So many countries need actual assistance but it seems only the select few get it and i am not even sure libya needed assistance in all honesty. One thing is for sure all those bombs they have dropped for no good reason could have fed many Somalians.

If the west really cared about people they would been in zim, somalia and some of the other horrific african countries but we all know caring about people is just a front.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X