South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Fsck Fsck Fsck.
Just out of interest, does anyone know how reliable wireless is over copper, specifically in terms of consistent performance? At the moment I'm rather wary of all forms of wireless broadband since I have yet to find one that offers the kind of latency I get on ADSl over copper. 3G is fast, but has high latency. Same with iBurst and Sentech. And that is if you are in an area where you get adequate signal strength. What is the story with WiMAX and CDMA?
Juice
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDMA2000CDMA2000 is a family of third-generation (3G) mobile telecommunications standards that use CDMA, a multiple access scheme for digital radio, to send voice, data, and signalling data (such as a dialed telephone number) between mobile phones and cell sites. It is the second generation of CDMA digital cellular.
Neotel has formed a team with Eskom and others. This surely means the provision of telecomms services through the electricity cables?
How would they compete with Telkom if they just use radio - ie. Wimax and CDMA? Any company can do this with a bit of cash. Where's the local loop unbundling ....??
By definition copper wires are wires, by definition wireless mean no wires.
Dont think there's any hard & fast rule on this one ... depends on each's own environment/location. Personally my iBurst & 3G/HSDPA are more reliable than my telephone line (e.g. during thunderstorms etc.), but I'm sure other's will have the opposite result.Er... sorry, I was querying the reliability of wireless as opposed to (over) copper...
surely the latency would be around 200-500? locally