Cellphone masts: health debate continues

Funny, I had no idea that the Murray Hewlett in Northcliff that I know of was "a geneticist" nor "chief executive of an asset management company" - in fact the one I know of owns Affinity Data (http://www.affinitydata.co.za/) which claims to be the "premier" purveyors of marketing list databases (i.e. the go-to people for spammers). He also has a penchant for litigation, just ask anyone who's accused him of spamming or that he thinks has "stolen" his database (he claims to have a database containing every single South African's details). Anyway, I'm sure this post won't be here for long due to the reasons mentioned :)
 
2012 said:
I'm still waiting for him to explain div, curl and grad of an electric field. If he's read all these papers on the dangers he'd at least some understanding of the mathematics behind electromagnetic radiation right?
Click to expand...

Well you must be the only scientist that can proof there is no risk. Please point this uneducated soul then in the correct direction.
 
Beri said:
Is that your contribution to the topic?
Click to expand...

Well I haven't seen you provide anything more than fallacies and debunked pseudoscientific nonsense to the topic, so...

Also, your opinion on the matter is irrelevant. It's a scientific question, not a matter of opinion. And the science says you're wrong.
 
Beri said:
He must be uneducated as well. Lots of idiots out there.
But why does it bother you when some has a different opinion then yours.
Are you that insecure.
Click to expand...

The only person bothered by others differing with their opinion, is you :whistle:

EDIT: Oh, and here is a far more credible study than the stuff you posted earlier (even if it is just the summary). Your hero Karl Muller actually tried to use this as evidence that cellular usage and radiation cause brain cancer...
 
Last edited:
Which homeopathic remedy can I take to counter the effects of cellphone radiation? Would I need a different remedy for wifi radiation?
 
Maverick Jester said:
The only person bothered by others differing with their opinion, is you :whistle:
Click to expand...

And that is your opinion......
I base my opinion on reports that say there is no proof that there is no risk. Even the master cannot give me the proof. Show me the report that show there is zoro risk.



My last word on this. My mommy said i must go to school. The grownups must go back to work
 
Beri said:
And that is your opinion......
I base my opinion on reports that say there is no proof that there is no risk. Even the master cannot give me the proof. Show me the report that show there is zoro risk.



My last word on this. My mommy said i must go to school. The grownups must go back to work
Click to expand...

Check my edit.
 
Wasn't there a similar case where people got all sick and pukey from a iBurst antenna cluster? Wasn't the same people still sick an pukey whilst the antenna cluster wasn't on for 6 weeks?

Perhaps I need to sue the US Government and Intelsat for all the crap they are beaming down from all kinds of angles with their satellites which they hide so high up that I cant see them to protect myself.

Wait..tinfoil hat! Which side must face outward again..?

In all seriousness, people have gone on about electromagnetic radiation poisoning since the dawn of modern electricity. When radios came into homes, the "experts" cautioned against it. When TV came into homes, other "experts" cautioned against it. Same with satellite TV and now cellphones. Curious that despite all of these invisible killer technologies, the human race still lives considerable longer than before this evil came along.
 
Last edited:
lcbxx said:
Wasn't there a similar case where people got all sick and pukey from a iBurst antenna cluster? Wasn't the same people still sick an pukey whilst the antenna cluster wasn't on for 6 weeks?

Perhaps I need to sue the US Government and Intelsat for all the crap they are beaming down from all kinds of angles with their satellites which they hide so high up that I cant see them to protect myself.

Wait..tinfoil hat! Which side must face outward again..?
Click to expand...

Exactly that.

Make sure the reflective side faces outwards, although these days you need a tinfoil full body suit, and it needs to be lead lined.
 
Beri said:
And that is your opinion......
I base my opinion on reports that say there is no proof that there is no risk. Even the master cannot give me the proof. Show me the report that show there is zoro risk.
Click to expand...

That's not how science works. You also won't find a report that says there is zero risk of cancer when drinking apple juice. You're approaching it from the wrong angle. It's the people that claim that it does cause cancer that should provide evidence of this claim.

Also...

2560868-zorro.jpg
 
Beri,

What you're not getting (and a number of people are trying to point out for you) is that you cannot prove a negative.

Let me flip it around for you:

You have a hypothesis that there is NO causal relation between A and B, i.e. A does not cause B.

Now please give us the methodology you would use to CONCLUSIVELY provide proof that A does NOT cause B.

Please give us a short overview of the design of your experiment to conclusively provide the proof.

Thanks!

PS. Calling me a spin doctor when you cannot answer logical questions or statements put to you only shows up an inability to debate the facts.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X