Cool Ideas Fibre ISP - Feedback

Status
Not open for further replies.
Contention isnt as relative as it used to be as it was more around the last mile. Which should now be uncontended, but that isn't realistic either. PON networks more specifically due to the sharing and splitting. At the ISP level you just really need to manage access capacity which we never saturate. If we need more bandwidth we buy more it's as simple as that.
 
PBCool said:
Contention isnt as relative as it used to be as it was more around the last mile. Which should now be uncontended, but that isn't realistic either. PON networks more specifically due to the sharing and splitting. At the ISP level you just really need to manage access capacity which we never saturate. If we need more bandwidth we buy more it's as simple as that.
Click to expand...
How can I then ensure a low contention on last mile on Vuma?
 
wingnut771 said:
How can I then ensure a low contention on last mile on Vuma?
Click to expand...
Vuma trenched last mile is gigabit copper to an aggregation switch. There may be contention on the back haul from that switch to their backbone but I doubt it's a thing.
 
sand_man said:
For sure, but there's 'transparency'. And conversely if you want 1:1 contention ratios you can have it but expect to pay bombs...
Click to expand...
Yet the cheapest Vuma bundle "Firestream" advertises UNCONTENDED.

I guess that means everyone is UNCONTENDED.
 
What would be the correct iperf settings for 20M line?

My install is coming up and will make sure I hold him hostage (got 5 rottweilers) until I see a pass test.

What does a pass look like?
 
wingnut771 said:
What would be the correct iperf settings for 20M line?

My install is coming up and will make sure I hold him hostage (got 5 rottweilers) until I see a pass test.

What does a pass look like?
Click to expand...

I would guess 18 - 20.

This is accepted as a pass.

c:\iperf>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 180M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 4] local 192.168.88.252 port 54418 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 21.7 MBytes 182 Mbits/sec 0.070 ms 73/2845 (2.6%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 21.4 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.122 ms 0/2745 (0%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.113 ms 0/2748 (0%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 0/2746 (0%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.107 ms 1/2747 (0.036%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.051 ms 0/2746 (0%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.053 ms 1/2747 (0.036%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.107 ms 0/2747 (0%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 21.4 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.070 ms 0/2744 (0%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.055 ms 0/2749 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 218 MBytes 183 Mbits/sec 0.067 ms 75/27961 (0.27%)
[ 4] Sent 27961 datagrams

iperf Done.

200/200
 
jannier said:
I would guess 18 - 20.

This is accepted as a pass.

c:\iperf>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 180M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[ 4] local 192.168.88.252 port 54418 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 21.7 MBytes 182 Mbits/sec 0.070 ms 73/2845 (2.6%)
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 21.4 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.122 ms 0/2745 (0%)
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.113 ms 0/2748 (0%)
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 0/2746 (0%)
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.107 ms 1/2747 (0.036%)
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.051 ms 0/2746 (0%)
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.053 ms 1/2747 (0.036%)
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.107 ms 0/2747 (0%)
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 21.4 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.070 ms 0/2744 (0%)
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 180 Mbits/sec 0.055 ms 0/2749 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 218 MBytes 183 Mbits/sec 0.067 ms 75/27961 (0.27%)
[ 4] Sent 27961 datagrams

iperf Done.

200/200
Click to expand...
:thumbsup:
 
wingnut771 said:
You would assume Vuma would do these tests onsite before they leave.
Click to expand...
The ont was swapped out but wasn't provisioned yet or configured or whatever it is they do. So wasn't syncing.

I actually told the youngster the ont was being replaced owing to packet loss. He was like, 'what's packet loss'?
 
sand_man said:
The ont was swapped out but wasn't provisioned yet or configured or whatever it is they do. So wasn't syncing.

I actually told the youngster the ont was being replaced owing to packet loss. He was like, 'what's packet loss'?
Click to expand...
:X3:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X