Cool Ideas Fibre ISP - Feedback

[PBCool]

@PBCool

Openserve popped by just now and swapped out my white ONT box for the new black Nokia one. The difference is quite remarkable. Speed tests haven't really gone anywhere - latency might be slightly better. But the difference is clear as day when browsing the web. Websites pop into view instantly and the responsiveness feels like when I first got fibre.

Surely no one on Openserve fibre should be using the old white ONT box.

Well in most situations it's more around whether it's an issue or not, no provider is going to replace a bunch of hardware just for good measure. More around a case by case basis, which is what we have to go through as the ISP.

 

[Mr Scratch]

@PBCool

Hey Paul, still struggling with Openserve to find out what's cracking, do you know if I would be able to find out which provider is "managing" our existing service if I provide you with a B number?

 

[PBCool]

@PBCool

Hey Paul, still struggling with Openserve to find out what's cracking, do you know if I would be able to find out which provider is "managing" our existing service if I provide you with a B number?

Usually not, it's best to ask Sam to follow up with Openserve if we can. As you can imagine it's confidential information.

 

[Mr Scratch]

Usually not, it's best to ask Sam to follow up with Openserve if we can. As you can imagine it's confidential information.

100% will try

Thanks for all the help thus far, and the patience with such an unusual situation.

 

[sand_man]

@PBCool

Openserve popped by just now and swapped out my white ONT box for the new black Nokia one. The difference is quite remarkable. Speed tests haven't really gone anywhere - latency might be slightly better. But the difference is clear as day when browsing the web. Websites pop into view instantly and the responsiveness feels like when I first got fibre.

Surely no one on Openserve fibre should be using the old white ONT box.

How's your iperf test? Mine's still completely fcked!! almost 50 days later...

 

[wingnut771]

How's your iperf test? Mine's still completely fcked!! almost 50 days later...

What is their response?

 

[sand_man]

What is their response?

Their response is for me to run more iperf tests. Iperf test after iperf test after iperf test... Vumatel are like, 'well, we've swapped the ONT, that's it, over to you Cool Ideas'. The last 50 days that's been the grand sum of it. Swapped the ONT, over and out... thanks for coming...

TBH I don't see packet loss (or symptoms of it) anywhere else other than via an iperf test, so.....? I don't know what to make of it...

 

[wingnut771]

Their response is for me to run more iperf tests. Iperf test after iperf test after iperf test... Vumatel are like, 'well, we've swapped the ONT, that's it, over to you Cool Ideas'. The last 50 days that's been the grand sum of it. Swapped the ONT, over and out... thanks for coming...

TBH I don't see packet loss (or symptoms of it) anywhere else other than via an iperf test, so.....? I don't know what to make of it...

@PBCool - iperf schooling please.

 

[Bryn]

How's your iperf test? Mine's still completely fcked!! almost 50 days later...

I thought iperf tests are run between two PCs? How do you use the tool?

 

[StoneCold]

@PBCool

Openserve popped by just now and swapped out my white ONT box for the new black Nokia one. The difference is quite remarkable. Speed tests haven't really gone anywhere - latency might be slightly better. But the difference is clear as day when browsing the web. Websites pop into view instantly and the responsiveness feels like when I first got fibre.

Surely no one on Openserve fibre should be using the old white ONT box.

I envy that you got a black one. I have a white Nokia one. A black one would've blended better as my PC and other devices are all black, lol.

 

[Jordan_Za]

Loaded a ticket at 13:30. Phoned CISP at 17:11, held for 15mins. And only then did someone help. I see PBcool is saying we should phone, but what’s the point of loading tickets then? It’s just a waste of our time if people phoning in are being prioritized!?!?

SUPER frustrating as if the vumatel ticket was loaded during working hours at least I stood half a chance of being helped tomorrow!!!

 

[sand_man]

I thought iperf tests are run between two PCs? How do you use the tool?

Download the tool
https://iperf.fr/iperf-download.php

Extract to root
Run command prompt as administrator
Enter the following values:

UDP receive from international server
C:>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

UDP sending to international server
C:>iperf3.exe -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

TCP receive from international server
C:>iperf3.exe -R -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

TCP sending to international server
C:>iperf3.exe -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

 

[PBCool]

Loaded a ticket at 13:30. Phoned CISP at 17:11, held for 15mins. And only then did someone help. I see PBcool is saying we should phone, but what’s the point of loading tickets then? It’s just a waste of our time if people phoning in are being prioritized!?!?

SUPER frustrating as if the vumatel ticket was loaded during working hours at least I stood half a chance of being helped tomorrow!!!

The native problem with tickets is that they are addressed sequentially, so if there was a network outage the evening before etc this creates a backlog. If you have an urgent issue like a line down, without anything on the notifications page then call.

 

[Jordan_Za]

Thanks Paul, out of interest, are Vumatel required to keep the PON Head online during load shedding?
We came back on after Stage 2 went to Stage 1, and the bloody ONT sync’d. Now before phoning I reset the ONT 3 times, and rebooted my Mik. I was getting LOS. now all of a sudden after load shedding ends I get link up.

Vumatel said it was my line and no one else reported Link Down, so unless people are blatantly lying...... ‍

 

[PBCool]

Thanks Paul, out of interest, are Vumatel required to keep the PON Head online during load shedding?
We came back on after Stage 2 went to Stage 1, and the bloody ONT sync’d. Now before phoning I reset the ONT 3 times, and rebooted my Mik. I was getting LOS. now all of a sudden after load shedding ends I get link up.

Vumatel said it was my line and no one else reported Link Down, so unless people are blatantly lying...... ‍

That sounds like the head end was dead, can you PM me your ticket number?

 

[DeatheCore]

Twitch has been absolutely flawless tonight *touches wood*

 

[Nicholas Marzio]

Twitch has been absolutely flawless tonight *touches wood*

Inb4 load shedding

 

[Bryn]

Download the tool
https://iperf.fr/iperf-download.php

Extract to root
Run command prompt as administrator
Enter the following values:

UDP receive from international server
C:>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

UDP sending to international server
C:>iperf3.exe -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

TCP receive from international server
C:>iperf3.exe -R -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

TCP sending to international server
C:>iperf3.exe -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za

Thanks. Here we go:

C:\>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 65122 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 13 and received packet = 21 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 14 and received packet = 22 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 25 and received packet = 26 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 29 and received packet = 30 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 1284 and received packet = 1285 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 3516 and received packet = 3524 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 3521 and received packet = 3525 AND SP = 4
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  8.70 MBytes  73.0 Mbits/sec  0.685 ms  2508/3615 (69%)
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  8.59 MBytes  72.0 Mbits/sec  0.621 ms  1343/2442 (55%)
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  8.53 MBytes  71.5 Mbits/sec  0.651 ms  1349/2441 (55%)
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  8.52 MBytes  71.5 Mbits/sec  0.613 ms  1347/2437 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12510 and received packet = 12511 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12564 and received packet = 12565 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12737 and received packet = 12738 AND SP = 4
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  8.58 MBytes  71.9 Mbits/sec  0.631 ms  1349/2444 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 14100 and received packet = 14101 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 15434 and received packet = 15435 AND SP = 4
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  8.48 MBytes  71.2 Mbits/sec  0.614 ms  1358/2442 (56%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16174 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16175 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16176 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16177 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16178 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16179 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  8.59 MBytes  72.0 Mbits/sec  0.574 ms  1348/2441 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 18506 and received packet = 18507 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 18766 and received packet = 18767 AND SP = 4
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  8.59 MBytes  72.0 Mbits/sec  0.641 ms  1345/2442 (55%)
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  8.62 MBytes  72.3 Mbits/sec  0.651 ms  1338/2441 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 24656 and received packet = 24657 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 24837 and received packet = 24838 AND SP = 4
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  8.57 MBytes  71.9 Mbits/sec  0.600 ms  1348/2443 (55%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   204 MBytes   171 Mbits/sec  0.607 ms  14950/26167 (57%)
[  4] Sent 26167 datagrams
[SUM]  0.0-10.0 sec  22 datagrams received out-of-order

iperf Done.

C:\>iperf3.exe -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 61588 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  10.5 MBytes  87.7 Mbits/sec  1338
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1454
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.4 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1454
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.4 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   113 MBytes  94.6 Mbits/sec  2.139 ms  8010/14418 (56%)
[  4] Sent 14418 datagrams

iperf Done.

C:\>iperf3.exe -R -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 50781 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   787 KBytes  6.45 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.21 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.21 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.21 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.22 MBytes  10.3 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.24 MBytes  10.4 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.26 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.26 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.6 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.1 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

C:\>iperf3.exe -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 50783 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   384 KBytes  3.14 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.50 MBytes  12.6 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.38 MBytes  11.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.38 MBytes  11.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.50 MBytes  12.6 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.38 MBytes  11.5 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.5 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec                  sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.5 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

 

[StoneCold]

Thanks. Here we go:

C:\>iperf3.exe -R -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 65122 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 13 and received packet = 21 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 14 and received packet = 22 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 25 and received packet = 26 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 29 and received packet = 30 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 1284 and received packet = 1285 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 3516 and received packet = 3524 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 3521 and received packet = 3525 AND SP = 4
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  8.70 MBytes  73.0 Mbits/sec  0.685 ms  2508/3615 (69%)
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  8.59 MBytes  72.0 Mbits/sec  0.621 ms  1343/2442 (55%)
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  8.53 MBytes  71.5 Mbits/sec  0.651 ms  1349/2441 (55%)
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  8.52 MBytes  71.5 Mbits/sec  0.613 ms  1347/2437 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12510 and received packet = 12511 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12564 and received packet = 12565 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 12737 and received packet = 12738 AND SP = 4
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  8.58 MBytes  71.9 Mbits/sec  0.631 ms  1349/2444 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 14100 and received packet = 14101 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 15434 and received packet = 15435 AND SP = 4
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  8.48 MBytes  71.2 Mbits/sec  0.614 ms  1358/2442 (56%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16174 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16175 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16176 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16177 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16178 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 16179 and received packet = 16187 AND SP = 4
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  8.59 MBytes  72.0 Mbits/sec  0.574 ms  1348/2441 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 18506 and received packet = 18507 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 18766 and received packet = 18767 AND SP = 4
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  8.59 MBytes  72.0 Mbits/sec  0.641 ms  1345/2442 (55%)
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  8.62 MBytes  72.3 Mbits/sec  0.651 ms  1338/2441 (55%)
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 24656 and received packet = 24657 AND SP = 4
iperf3: OUT OF ORDER - incoming packet = 24837 and received packet = 24838 AND SP = 4
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  8.57 MBytes  71.9 Mbits/sec  0.600 ms  1348/2443 (55%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   204 MBytes   171 Mbits/sec  0.607 ms  14950/26167 (57%)
[  4] Sent 26167 datagrams
[SUM]  0.0-10.0 sec  22 datagrams received out-of-order

iperf Done.

C:\>iperf3.exe -u -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 61588 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  10.5 MBytes  87.7 Mbits/sec  1338
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1454
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.4 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1454
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  11.4 MBytes  95.4 Mbits/sec  1455
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  11.4 MBytes  95.3 Mbits/sec  1455
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   113 MBytes  94.6 Mbits/sec  2.139 ms  8010/14418 (56%)
[  4] Sent 14418 datagrams

iperf Done.

C:\>iperf3.exe -R -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
Reverse mode, remote host queen.cisp.co.za is sending
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 50781 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   787 KBytes  6.45 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.21 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.21 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.21 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.22 MBytes  10.3 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.24 MBytes  10.4 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.26 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.26 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.6 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.1 MBytes  10.2 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

C:\>iperf3.exe -b 160M -p 17001 -c queen.cisp.co.za
Connecting to host queen.cisp.co.za, port 17001
[  4] local 192.168.1.230 port 50783 connected to 62.233.65.195 port 17001
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   384 KBytes  3.14 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.50 MBytes  12.6 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.38 MBytes  11.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.38 MBytes  11.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.50 MBytes  12.6 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.25 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.38 MBytes  11.5 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.5 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec                  sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.5 MBytes  10.5 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

If I'm not mistaken, you should change the packet size (160M) to 80M (if you have a 100mb line, which I think you do?). Sand_man has a 200mb line . You'll get different results (or at least I did with my 100mb OS line).

 

[Bryn]

If I'm not mistaken, you should change the packet size (160M) to 80M (if you have a 100mb line, which I think you do?). Sand_man has a 200mb line . You'll get different results (or at least I did with my 100mb OS line).

Ah, thanks! Will redo the tests.