South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'm still waiting for CW to answer my question, which may explain the prices. If there is contention, do capped accounts get priority over uncapped accounts?Hi, I would like to find out how your 20Mb Uncapped is R999 per month and how your capped 200GB 20Mb is R1028? Shouldn't uncapped be more expensive than your capped accounts?
Hi, I would like to find out how your 20Mb Uncapped is R999 per month and how your capped 200GB 20Mb is R1028? Shouldn't uncapped be more expensive than your capped accounts?
I'm still waiting for CW to answer my question, which may explain the prices. If there is contention, do capped accounts get priority over uncapped accounts?
So if there is contention, is bandwidth distributed equally to all tier 1 accounts regardless of line speed, capped/uncapped etc ?There are three tiers of priority - 1, 2, and 3.
Tier 1 has the highest priority on all protocols, and there is no specific account level shaping policy here.
Tier 2 data has the highest priority on all protocols except downloads, and will shape downloads and release this after midnight.
Tier 3 data has lower priorities on the network overall than the other 2 tiers, and is shaped on large download protocols as well with an FUP.
We have not released products on tier 3 data yet. All existing products operate in tier 1 and tier 2 data.
So if there is contention, is bandwidth distributed equally to all tier 1 accounts regardless of line speed, capped/uncapped etc ?
This referral code business is somewhat tacky and makes the reliability and impartiality of user recommendations on this forum questionable. There should be no incentive for users to recommend Crystal Web. Incentives can only taint objectivity.
While I have no complaints about my CW account, I get a queasy feeling when I see other threads on this forum getting swamped and spammed with ref coders.
If you have budgeted for the cost of this referral ponzi scheme, rather put it that budget towards a higher unshaped thresholds, or better product pricing.
I'm moving to a new ISP end of the month and was considering CW.
For me its unforunate that CW uses Cybersmart because I stay in Pretoria and will get higher pings than with IS, or MTN.
This referral code business is somewhat tacky and makes the reliability and impartiality of user recommendations on this forum questionable. There should be no incentive for users to recommend Crystal Web. Incentives can only taint objectivity.
While I have no complaints about my CW account, I get a queasy feeling when I see other threads on this forum getting swamped and spammed with ref coders.
If you have budgeted for the cost of this referral ponzi scheme, rather put it that budget towards a higher unshaped thresholds, or better product pricing.
I'm moving to a new ISP end of the month and was considering CW.
For me its unforunate that CW uses Cybersmart because I stay in Pretoria and will get higher pings than with IS, or MTN.
There is certainly infrastructure in Gauteng - considerable infrastructure.![]()
It's a R10 discount.
WTF are you even talking about.
R10 suddenly makes it tacky and makes the reliability and impartiality of user recommendations on this forum questionable?4
That is a bit of a stretch.
We recommend CW because of performance not because of a R10 discount.
I mean really now.
Don't take us for a bunch of morons.