wingnut771
Honorary Master
I signed up for CW mid April. During the sign up I don't remember selecting an activation date but after signing up I got an email saying that the services are provided on the basis of an up front payment. My previous ISP required a months notice so I gave that notice as required and paid CW for services for June. I had emailed them numerous times to change my activation date to 1 June. I also had an online chat with someone, where I very politely asked that my activation date be changed to 1 June 2015. I have never received a response, except for a few very acerbic emails reminding me that my May invoice was overdue.
My most recent email is from their CEO (Shaun) saying that I must pay the R395 for services for the month of May. My rationale is that I didn't use their services in the month of May as I was not connected to the CW network at all.
Except I had connected to CW in May... I connected on 31 May 2015 10:58pm. Apparently, according to Shaun, this warrants the use of their services and I should pay the R395.
I'm not sure of the ethics here. Does this really warrant being invoiced and liable for a full month?
In my opinion: no. It does not.
But I'm really questioning the business ethics of a CEO who would pose this logic. This is the CEO of an ISP who is apparently the best ISP in the country, and they apparently have the happiest customers. Billing me for an hour and 2 minutes after ignoring repeated emails and messages to their customer support team, asking to change my activation date speaks volumes of this wonderful ISP. Maybe this is the sign of things to come. Today its excepting full payment for seriously minimal use, tomorrow its being sneaky in how they bill me for my usage.
CW is not for me. Time to move on.
wow
