ITNT Capped DSL Feedback

Hmm, don't know if it's a bug or a marketing ploy but you cannot seem to top-up really. You can only upgrade your account to a higher package.

Screenshot%202014-09-22%2009.58.55.png
 
After reading this thread i am cancelling my stupid R397 afrihost uncapped. Most expensive ISP ATM, and throttling me like a boss.
 
Hmm, don't know if it's a bug or a marketing ploy but you cannot seem to top-up really. You can only upgrade your account to a higher package.

Screenshot%202014-09-22%2009.58.55.png

So you wouldn't be able to buy another 10 gigs? You'd need to top up with 15GB, then 25GB, etc? That's a little dodge.
 
Can one have two accounts. Ie two 200gb accounts
 
So you wouldn't be able to buy another 10 gigs? You'd need to top up with 15GB, then 25GB, etc? That's a little dodge.

I can understand this .
To process , for example , 3 Rands for 3 GB is not economicaly viable .
 
Can't you just sign up for an additional 10GB package perhaps?

Maybe mail them and see, they seem fairly new so very likely it is a bug in their system?
 
I can understand this .
To process , for example , 3 Rands for 3 GB is not economicaly viable .

Well sure, but if you want to "pay as you go" for example, and you generally use about 200GB a month, you'd need to top up with increasingly large increments, so if you under-used towards the end of the month, you'd likely have bought more gigs than you needed. Perhaps this is the strategy behind it - but if it is an oversight, they should sort it out.
 
Wonder why? Are they even allowed to do that? o.0

One way of bypassing shaping rules for downloads is to use a VPN on an unshaped port, or to disguise traffic - so that's likely the reason. I wonder how they classify VPN traffic though - if they started charging 1.5x the traffic for watching Netflix through Unotelly for example, I reckon there would be a lot of pissed off people.
 
One way of bypassing shaping rules for downloads is to use a VPN on an unshaped port, or to disguise traffic - so that's likely the reason. I wonder how they classify VPN traffic though - if they started charging 1.5x the traffic for watching Netflix through Unotelly for example, I reckon there would be a lot of pissed off people.

Very likely I guess, they are shaped accounts if I am not mistaken.
Although how do they know what is VPN traffic and what isn't?

Just monitor those few VPN ports?
 
Last edited:
One way of bypassing shaping rules for downloads is to use a VPN on an unshaped port, or to disguise traffic - so that's likely the reason. I wonder how they classify VPN traffic though - if they started charging 1.5x the traffic for watching Netflix through Unotelly for example, I reckon there would be a lot of pissed off people.
Ooh, they had better not do that for netflix. Although, its not VPN data at all.
 
Technically speaking, your Netflix data is only proxied by Unotelly, so not a vpn.

That said, interesting that they count VPNs at 1.5x the traffic. Can theoretically say, VPNs are intended for business purposes, so may as well charge more for that type of traffic because of that reason.
 
Well regardless the data is still extremely cheap. Much cheaper than other ISP's, if it does not work for you then it is not as if you suddenly do not have internet - just move back to what you were previously using.

Technically speaking, your Netflix data is only proxied by Unotelly, so not a vpn.

That said, interesting that they count VPNs at 1.5x the traffic. Can theoretically say, VPNs are intended for business purposes, so may as well charge more for that type of traffic because of that reason.

Yeah, generally but not always. Nothing stopping me from running a VPN so I can monitor my downloads while I am away for the weekend or whatever.

I doubt it will effect many of us here anyways.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X