The reason I used the world "kill" is because they did not play open cards with the other stake holders in the x86 arena. Sure, HP were in bed with them for IA-64, but the smug statement they made about the competition closing their doors really was not the smartest thing to do.
Intel should realize what they sux at and then partner with the right companies and develop a new platform. That is, if they want to do something right for change....
I see a lot of you are comparing the latest intels against the latest AMDs and thereby trying to justify that intel does not sux.
It is a fact that the new intels perform better than AMD. You cannot argue with those facts.
There it another type of fact that you can also not argue against and that is facts of history. My whole post'n'half is entirely based on happenings in the past. It aims to educate the uneducated about intels history and highlight the amount of failures and shady practices they pursue. I did not even mention the EU antitrust law suit against them - there is so much more I can add if I wanted to.
So to summaries...
Fact : intel is king of x86 performance at the moment.
Fact : intel has a history clouded in failure and unethical behavouir.
If only performance matters to you - buy intel. If care about ethics and fair trade, read up on the history of things.
Should anyone want to comment/add/correct any of the historical statements cover in my story on why intel suxs, please feel free. But leave the benchmarks out of this because we all know currently is performs the best.
P.S. thanks for the signature typo you guys picked up
Intel have only started using an integrated memory controller, 3 years after amd started using it yet they have done more with the technology in one year than amd did in 3 years.
Keep stealing intel, we want to move forward.
Ethics?Is ethics gonna help a person to get the most out a CPU regarding O/C,speed etc. etc?I don't think so.Imagine walking walking into a shop asking the sales person for an Ethics CPU.He will think that you are as high as a kite.It's like the people said: price VS performance.
If only performance matters to you - buy intel. If care about ethics and fair trade, read up on the history of things.
So you dont support [or use products from] Eskom/Telkom/Sasko/Tiger Brands/Pick 'n Pay/Checkers and the list can go on!?
or are you very selective in which companies ethics/history is important to you?
The exact point I made a few pages ago![]()
Aqua_lung, last paragraph of my story is about the future being fusion. Read that - its gonna be a tough one for intel to copy
An article appears today on Bright Side of the News (BSN), which suggests AMD is guilty of the very things they accused Intel of — namely, of attempting to stifle competition and product development by exerting their influence onto various companies.
The author, Theo Valich, has been able to draw together several off-the-record sources who, under conditions of anonymity, paint a picture of AMD’s desire to only allow controlled competition for its GPU cards by OEMs.
Aqua_lung, last paragraph of my story is about the future being fusion. Read that - its gonna be a tough one for intel to copy